Samsung 950 Pro M.2 NVME SSD Review (256/512GB) – The NVMe Effect



For our last benchmark, we have decided to use PCMark 8 Extended Storage Workload in order to determine steady state throughput of the SSD. This software is the longest in our battery of tests and takes just under 18 hours per SSD. As this is a specialized component of PCMark 8 Professional, its final result is void of any colorful graphs or charts typical of the normal online results and deciphering the resulting excel file into an easily understood result takes several more hours.

There are 18 phases of testing throughout the entire run, 8 runs of the Degradation Phase, 5 runs of the Steady State Phase and 5 runs of the Recovery Phase. In each phase, several performance tests are run of 10 different software programs; Adobe After Effects, Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop Heavy and Photoshop Light, Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint and Word, as well as Battlefield 3 and World of Warcraft to cover the gaming element.

  • PRECONDITIONING -The entire SSD is filled twice sequentially with random data of a 128KB file size. The second run accounts for overprovisioning that would have escaped the first;
  • DEGRADATION PHASE – The SSD is hit with random writes of between 4KB and 1MB for 10 minutes and then a single pass performance test is done of each application. The cycle is repeated 8 times, and with each time, the duration of random writes increases by 5 minutes;
  • STEADY STATE PHASE – The drive is hit with random writes of between 4KB and 1MB for 45 minutes before each application is put through a performance test. This process is repeated 5 times;
  • RECOVERY PHASE – The SSD is allowed to idle for 5 minutes before and between performance tests of all applications. This is repeated 5 times which accounts for garbage collection; and
  • CLEANUP – The entire SSD is written with zero data at a write size of 128KB

In reading the results, the Degrade and Steady State phases represent heavy workload testing while the recovery phase represents typical consumer light workload testing.


As you can see, performance is recorded in terms of Bandwidth and Latency. Bandwidth (or throughput) represents the total throughput the drive is able to sustain during the tests during each phase. Latency, at least for the purposes of PCMark 8, takes on a different outlook and for this, we will term it ‘Total Storage Latency’. Typically, latency has been addressed as the time it takes for a command to be executed, or rather, the time from when the last command completed to the time that the next command started. This is shown below as ‘Average Latency’.

PCMark 8 provides a slightly different measurement, however, that we are terming as ‘Total Storage Latency’. This is represented as being the period from the time the last command was completed, until the time it took to complete the next task; the difference of course being that the execution of that task is included in ‘Total Storage Latency’. For both latency graphs, the same still exists where the lower the latency, the faster the responsiveness of the system will be. While both latency charts look very similar, the scale puts into perspective how just a few milliseconds can increase the length of time to complete multiple workloads.

For a more in-depth look into Latency, Bandwidth, and IOPS check out our primer article on them here.


These results show the total average bandwidth across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the higher the result the better.

Samsung 950 Pro 512GB AB


These results show the average access time during the workloads across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the lower the result the better.

Samsung 950 Pro 512GB AL


These results show the total access time across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the lower the result the better.

Samsung 950 Pro 512GB TL

The Samsung 950  Pro M.2 512GB was top dog, even surpassing the much higher priced enterprise Intel P3700 NVMe SSD, when it came to bandwidth, but it ran in the middle of tyhe pack for average and total latency.


We don’t suggest relying entirely on manufacturer specific benchmarks, however, we are presently testing the newest version of Samsung Magician V4.8b and it is the latest version compatible with the Samsung 950 Pro. We cannot promise that it will be released concurrent to this SSD, however, should be relatively soon.

Samsung Magician Main Display

The key to the Samsung Magician lies in the fact that one can quickly and easily complete a secure erase of Samsung SSDs, overprovisioning can be adjust manually to suit company needs, and also, the newest version does a great job of identifying system specifications.  Lastly, the performance test of the newest 512GB 950 Pro resulted as such:

Samsung Magician 950 Pro Performance

Random Read IOPS are a bit low but we saw them also max out well above 300K with independent benchmarks.