Intel 910 PCIe SSD Review – Amazing Performance Results In Both 400GB and 800GB Configurations


We will be evaluating the Intel 910 as both a 800GB and 400GB product as both capacities are available for purchase. First we will test the 800GB version with the Maximum Performance Mode. The SSD presents itself to the Operating System as 4 separate 200 GB volumes. There are a few choices for different software files systems and RAID implementations. If using Windows Server drive management, which we do for testing, there are three possible configurations that would be commonly used;

  • RAID 0 – Aggregating the capacity of all drives into one large volume, with data striped over it to increase throughput. This does not provide redundancy, and would be only used in conjunction with strong data protection plans.
  • RAID 5 – This provides parity for the four volumes, but also comes at a cost of capacity. The total capacity of the four volumes comes to 558 GB. Read speeds remain close to normal, however it suffers a large write performance penalty.
  • Four separate LUNs – This configuration simply uses the four drives individually. This might be the most common implementation.

FOB (Fresh Out of Box) measurements are taken when the SSD is new and hasnt been subjected to any use. As the device is used more we will see some lower results with write activity. Read speeds largely remain unchanged, so we can use these numbers as a comparison for the overall performance of the SSD. RAID 5 results are not included in two of these graphs as the read speeds mirror the other results, clouding the graph. The RAID 5 results are included where there are appreciable differences in performance.

The 4k Random Read Access time is the main means of checking the overall latency of any SSD. The Intel 910 scores well across the range of different Queue Depths. The RAID 0 and the 4 LUN results mirror each other closely, with the individual LUNs pulling ahead at overall latency in the much higher Queue Depths.

The 4K Random read measurements are one of the most-sought after measurements when making an analysis of drive performance. Indicative of the overall speed and agility of the SSD at random access, they are the litmus test for one of the key advantages that SSDs possess. We test with a five second ramp-time for all measurements that we provide for all benchmarks, for the purposes of eliminating bursty results. These results are well above the Intel advertised 180,000 rated IOPS.

Here we can see the results scale nicely across the higher Queue Depths with the RAID 0 actually pulling ahead in the higher QD performance, topping out at an outstanding 210,734 IOPS. Bear in mind that the RAID 5 results closely mirror those shown here for the 4k Random Read, almost exactly matching the RAID 0 results.

The results with 4 separate LUNs also score very well at 198,977 IOPS.blank

The 128K Sequential read speed will show us the maximum sequential throughput of the SSD with a realistic file size that the SSD would actually encounter in an enterprise usage scenario. The Intel 910 maxes out at 1.949 GB/s at QD128 with the four LUNs being accessed simultaneously. Raid 0 comes in with a slightly lower result at QD 128 with 1.861GB/s.

Finally, RAID 5 makes its debut into our charts, with somewhat lower read speeds, coming in at 1.6GB/s at QD128. As we move along in our testing, it will become apparent that there are some Windows limitations in the RAID 5 implementation that are effectively holding the Intel 910 performance back a bit. With other software based RAID implementations, there might be much higher results.blank


We begin delving into the difference between Steady State (SS), and 20% over provisioned (OP) execution for this battery of tests. We typically will include FOB (Fresh Out of Box) results, but for this SSD they will seldom be seen. They are also so much higher than the other results that they effectively alter the scale of the charts, blurring the granularity needed to see the differences between steady state and overprovisioned results.

The Steady State testing is conducted at 100% fill capacity, and utilizes full span writes. This is truly the torture test and gives an accurate picture of the SSD under the most demanding circumstances. Being a worst-case scenario, Steady State should be received as such. The 20% OP testing consists of 20% of the drive being left unformatted. The formatted region is filled to capacity, and written to full span. This provides results consistent with an optional performance boost for users.

For the 4k Random Write testing the Intel 910 scores well over the 75,000 rated IOPS that Intel is advertising.

‘RAID 0 SS’ (Steady State) results top out at a Queue Depth of 64 at 82,350 IOPS, and with overprovisioning at QD 64 it comes in at 89,374 IOPS.

The ‘Lun SS’ results (4 independent volumes accessed separately) come in at a maximum of 86,349 IOPS at a QD of 32, and the overprovisioned results for the same configuration score at a fantastic 98,845 IOPS at the same QD of 32. This is a tremendous amount of benefit from the 20% overprovisioning, and the clear winner at this measurement.

RAID 5 results are much lower, with the top speed logged at QD 128 being 24,428 IOPS. The lack of performance improvement with 20% overprovisioning signals that we may be running up against a limitation of the Windows RAID stack, and definitely not the performance of the drive.blank

The 128K Random Write results shows that the performance is relatively steady across the range of Queue Depths hovering around 350MB/s for the Raid 0 and LUN results. The overprovisioning brings about some great results again, topping the 350 MB/s mark, and reaching 368MB/s for the LUN Overprovisioned results. RAID 0 scores 333MB/s at a Queue Depth of 32. blank


  1. blank

    Simply Outstanding Review Paul!

    • blank

      Thanks, this one was my pleasure for sure. The 910 is one of the best SSDs that i have been lucky enough to test. Really shes a beast, just an awesome performer 🙂

  2. blank

    This looks like a dream product for VMware folks. Would it be possible to have PCI SSD reviews indicate whether the vendor supports multi-slot usage of the product?

  3. blank

    This is going to ROCK with nexenta or any other ZFS product. 2 of those with 4 mirrored drives across those 2 cards…. cant wait enough to test it behind SVC as tier0

  4. blank

    I just purchased the 800 GB 910 recently. I wish I would have read this article first because Intel’s documentation is abysmal on two important points (1) you cannot boot from the device, and (2) it appears as 4 devices to the system.

    My application is a workstation and I would have liked to be able to boot the O/S from a single 800 GB drive in order to keep things simple. I would have preferred they implemented a hardware RAID controller.

    Currently I have it configured in RAID 0 from Windows 7 and the first thing I did was put the paging file there (192 GB) which helps the overall system performance. Also, I have my RAM Disk backing store there so rebooting or shutting down the system is much faster now.

    I am interested in tiered storage solutions – can anyone provide a references for something that might work?

  5. blank

    Hey guys, what about security? Is there any way to have two of those cards mirrored? In case this card is used to store data files for e.g. an OLTP database it might dramatically increase database performance, but it NEEDS to be 100% bulletproof and data secure! Any ideas?

    • blank

      Yep, since it appears as 2 logical drives to the OS, you can do RAID 1 with the 400 GB (2 logical) and even RAID 5/6 with the 800 GB version (4 logical drives).

  6. blank
    Eliseu dos Santos Almeida

    El mundo incrible

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *