Intel 750 PCIe SSD Review (1.2TB) – 1st Consumer 2.4GB/s NVMe SSD Set To Change The Industry

COMPONENTS

Our review sample did not come in retail packaging. It was placed in an anti-static baggie and wrapped in bubble wrap. The overall design of the Intel 750 series looks very similar to that of the Intel DC P3000 family of SSDs.

Intel 750 1.2TB HHHL

It seems that the front simply has a different heat sink. When looking at the back, the PCB design is practically the same. There are a total of 14 NAND packages and two DRAM chips on the back.

Intel 750 1.2TB bACK

Our sample also came with both the HHHL and full length PCIe slot brackets. The top of the heat sink lists the 750’s information from serial number and capacity to firmware revision. It also states that this product was assembled in China. The PCIe bracket has holes in it to allow for better airflow and cooling. The heat sink includes airway grooves as well to aid with heat dissipation.

Once we remove the heat sink from the 750′ we get a close look at just how much this SSD mirrors the other Intel DC P3000 series SSDs. There are 18 NAND packages and three DRAM packages on this side.

Intel 750 1.2TB PCB and Heatsink Below we can also see two 330V Nichicon UD Series aluminum electrolytic capacitors that ensure that, in the case of an unexpected power-loss, in-flight data can be written to the NAND and your data is safe.

Intel 750 1.2TB Power-loss Caps

Taking a closer look at the controller, we can see that Intel is utilizing the same 18-channel flash controller (CH29AE41AB0) in the 750 as they are in the Intel DC P3700! Typically, SSD controllers range from 4-10 channels. By utilizing 18 channels Intel can take advantage of much more parallelism to allow for far greater speeds than we are used to seeing without the use of a complex RAID type configuration.

Intel 750 1.2TB NVMe Controller

Intel is utilizing their own 20nm 128Gbit MLC NAND flash in this SSD’s design. There are 86 NAND die overall in 32 packages on the 1.2TB model. 18 of the packages have 4 die (64GiB), the other 14 have a single die (16GiB). Overall, there is a RAW capacity of 1,376GiB. Once formatted the user accessible space is 1.09TB.

Intel 750 1.2TB NAND Intel 750 1.2TB DRAM

 

The DRAM memory is Micron DDR3 operating at 1066MHz. The 400GB model has 1GB of DRAM while the 1.2TB has 2GB.

40
Leave a Reply

avatar
16 Comment threads
24 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
23 Comment authors
Oddbjørn KvalsundstephenkamenarHad Enough With the BSChad CapelandNVMe_Fan Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Obsidian71
Guest
Obsidian71

You guys are replacing my keyboard. I just drooled all over it

Sean Webster
Guest

Haha, time for one of those water proof ones! Trust me, I found myself drooling uncontrollably after first receiving this SSD as well! I think that I even forgot how to speak for a bit.

darpa21214
Guest
darpa21214

Is it true that in the real world a user will notice no difference between an Intel 750 and a Samsung 850 pro or any other SSD for that mater?

Sean Webster
Guest

It depends on what your real world use is. Everyone has different workloads. If you are editing media heavily such as video and 4K video for that matter, yes there is a difference. If you are just a power user who does a lot of typical desktop tasks you are better off with a SATA SSD.

darpa21214
Guest
darpa21214

So for a person with an overclocked 5820K, 16gb of ram, four 4 TB HDs full of movies, who plays games and reads the internet, a 400gb 750 would be a waste of $150 over a Samsung 850 pro 512gb? or should I just blow the $150? I am not the price sensitive.

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Well…if you are one who likes the best and the fastest (evident by the OC), you might just have to have the 750 but, for what you describe, there will be no performance difference from the other SSD. Not being price sensitive, I’de be grabbing the 750 personally though…just sayin’.

Dash
Guest
Dash

It’s not going to help you with movies or surfing the web if you’re already running on SSD. It will benefit game loading times, but probably not by a noticeable amount.

Also, a word of warning on the 5820K, it’s been crippled to only have 28 PCIe lanes. Which means if you’re ever thinking of Crossfire/SLI on your graphics card then may start running out of lanes.

If you’re looking for a sensible decision, this isn’t it – but then, Haswell-E is probably not that sane either (I’ve got one, so I’m with you on that).

John Curtis
Guest
John Curtis

So my revodrive 3 x2 failed a few days ago and I was eyeing the p3700 but its a bit pricey. Is there a good reason not to consider this thing now?

Sean Webster
Guest

Up to you and your uses. The P3600 is rated for faster reads and writes, but a bit lower random writes. Then if you look at the endurance rating the P3600 is rated for 3 drive writes per day up to nearly 11PB TBW…not 219TB TBW. So the P3600 annihilates it in endurance if you need that for your workflow.

John Curtis
Guest
John Curtis

Its a solid point on the endurance. Its for a workstation so I might trade in this case I might favor the p3600 but it’s pretty amazing that tech has gotten to the point where this is even a decision.

Thanks for the note and great input as always!

Sean Webster
Guest

No problem, good luck with your decision!

Technostica
Guest
Technostica

If you actually are running workstation loads then this might be useful otherwise judging by the real world benchmarks I’ve seen elsewhere this is a waste of money.

Sean Webster
Guest

Yep, thus why it is targeted towards that market.

ShawnF
Guest
ShawnF

The 2.5-inch form factor model interests me. It says it ships with an add-on card? Is the SSD tethered to this card or can we use other SAS/Sata Express cards from LSI to power this thing?

Sean Webster
Guest

It comes with a SFF-8639 to SF-8643 cable. It is only compatible with a PCIe adapter of some sort such as an M.2 to SFF-8643. Currently the only supported motherboard for this SSD is the Asus X99 Sabertooth as it comes with an M.2 to SFF-8643 adapter. It will not work with SAS cards.

Guts
Guest
Guts

Hi, can anyone help to verify how fast was the boot up timing as I get a wide range of result for the boot up timing.

Techreport review claim 51 sec boot up which is slowest in all SSD and TT also claim that 750 is noticeable slower, yet the review here mentioned single digit boot up.

Just how fast? Any software to keep the exact timing?

Sean Webster
Guest

I had 9 seconds boot in the Z97 test system from power off to on after optimizing everything.

Guts
Guest
Guts

Hmmm so is about as fast as SATA drive, but just not much faster?

Sean Webster
Guest

Yeah, just about the same. The Samsung 850 Pro 128GB I have as the OS Drive normally boots from power off to desktop in about 8-10 seconds…even a bunch of other SSDs I’ve tested boot about the same.

Guts
Guest
Guts

Well then, I guess this drive need some firmware update to really boost up the boost speed. Probably better future bios update as well.

Dash
Guest
Dash

I suspect most of the delay in boot these days with SSD are BIOS/UEFI initialisations and or driver issues with Windows. All of which could vary from system to system.