Samsung SM951 M.2 PCIe SSD Review (512GB)

CRYSTAL DISK BENCHMARK VER. 3.0 X64

Crystal Disk Benchmark is used to measure read and write performance through sampling of random data which is, for the most part, incompressible. Performance is virtually identical, regardless of data sample so we have included only that using random data samples.

Samsung SM951 512GB CDM

Similar to the results we got with the Intel 750, Crystal Disk Mark shows a bit lower sequential speeds. Read maxes out at 1,760MB/s and writes reach 1,586MB/s. 4K QD1 read and write speeds are similar to other high-end SATA SSDs reaching 50MB/s read and 163MB/s write.

AS SSD BENCHMARK VER 1.7

The toughest benchmark available for solid state drives is AS SSD as it relies solely on incompressible data samples when testing performance. For the most part, AS SSD tests can be considered the ‘worst case scenario’ in obtaining data transfer speeds and many enthusiasts like AS SSD for their needs. Transfer speeds are displayed on the left with IOPS results on the right.

Samsung SM951 512GB AS SSD Samsung SM951 512GB AS SSD IOPS

While not the highest score ever achieved by a single SSD, the Samsung SM951 reached an impressive overall score of 2007. Both read and write speeds follow Crystal Disk Mark as they are a bit lower than ATTO’s results. Reads max out at 1,965MB/s and writes hit 1,508MB/s. In terms of IOPS we can see it is able to hit well over the 90K rating to 175K for read and85K write!

This AS SSD Copy Bench test is a true to life evaluation of performance as AS SSD creates three files (ISO/Program/Game), and simply moves them from one part of the SSD to another, recording their top speed and total transfer time. The best speed of 1,502MB/s was achieved via the ISO test which shows full performance saturation on the write side of the transfer, which is very nice to see.

Samsung SM951 512GB AS SSD Copy

ANVIL STORAGE UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL

Anvil’s Storage Utilities (ASU) are the most complete test bed available for the solid state drive today. The benchmark displays test results for, not only throughput but also, IOPS and Disk Access Times. Not only does it have a preset SSD benchmark, but also, it has included such things as endurance testing and threaded I/O read, write and mixed tests, all of which are very simple to understand and use in our benchmark testing.

Samsung SM951 512GB Anvil

While providing us another look at performance, Anvil Storage Utilities shows overall, they are similar to that of our other tests. An overall score of 9,487 was achieved, which simply triumphs that of the previous XP941’s score. Let’s move on to Iometer and see what we get.

IOMETER

Iometer is an I/O subsystem measurement and characterization tool for single and clustered systems. It was originally developed by the Intel Corporation, however, they discontinued work on the program. In 2003 it was re-launched by an international group of individuals who are now continuously improving, porting and extend the product that is now widely used within the industry. This is a very powerful benchmarking tool and we are just now starting to integrate it into our consumer reviews. At this point in time we are going to be running a 4KB random workload at QD32 for 30 seconds and show the average to measure performance.

Samsung SM951 512GB Iometer QD1 + QD32 30 SecondsHere we can see that the SM951 was able to maintain a high of 180K IOPS for read and for about 23 seconds maintain just over 100K IOPS for write. However, once the test continues you can see that it hits steady state write performance fairly quickly.

Samsung SM951 512GB Iometer 10 Min QD32

After about 30 seconds the write IOPS performance drops to around 10K IOPS and holds steady throughout the 10 minutes of testing. So, as long as you aren’t doing much high QD writes to the SSD, you should be set when it comes to performance. 180K read IOPS at QD32 is very nice, but so is the 12K QD1 IOPS performance. Let’s move on to some real world application benchmarks and see how it performs.

34 comments

  1. How does Samsung consistently end up on top of all other ssds? You have all these major players, Intel , Crucial , Toshiba , SanDisk. Every now and then someone gives them a challenge, but they seem to always end up back on top. Is it there controller, nand, firmware, controller/nand, what?
    And if you raid 0 two sata SanDisk extreme pros can you get
    the same consistency bandwidth as one of these m2 drives?

    • Samsung is a marketing Goliath. Because they are the largest tech company in the world (selling 4 cell phones and 2 TVs every second of the day), they have the resources to sink into their products. People buy Samsung SSDs just for the name because they recognize that name and trust it. Don’t get me wrong; the other companies are giants in their own right and, given the right marketing tactics, could compete with Samsung. They just aren’t there yet…or maybe they just haven’t made that right step.

      Want an example? Intel is the worlds top CPU. Could they not have made a CPU/SSD combo years ago when SSDs were on the rise…or even a CPU with great SSD discount coupon? I could go on forever with respect to selling flash…it is such an easy sell with just the right approach. Last but not least…look at Samsung’s release history and notice how well times everything always seems to be.

      • Thanks that was a very good explanation. But what about the second question? If you raid 0 two sata SanDisk extreme pros can you get
        the same consistency bandwidth as one of these m2 drives? The SanDisk had half bandwidth 200-250, so times 2 400-450 could it compete. I only ask because I have a old motherboard with no more pcie slots.

      • No the SanDisk RAID would not come close. Even with 100% incompressible data, this drive transfers data at speeds of 1.9GB/s read, 1.5GB/s write and 175K IOPS. This SSD is a blessing for those working in 4K media where a minimum of 1.4GB/s is necessary. I always speak of the importance of understanding ones need however and, with that, matching the right SSD with the task at hand. Does the typical PC user need this or will they ever understand its abilities? Absolutely not…but it is still sweet though isn’t it?

      • Diego Valenzuela Ossa

        today samsung evo 850 is technically the best deal for price and quality. and probably going for this SM951 card next year. my choice to buy the model I had wasn’t actually based on the brand name

  2. Whydoyoucloseyoureyes

    not a single review site has tested boot times with this disk. not one!!!

    • Boot times differ for the most part by seconds and cannot be measured accurately as each system is different. The importance of boot times is seen between the hard drive and the SSD. To compare SSD boot times is a defeating task as the boot time, for the most part, is based on disk access times for which most SSDs are a fraction of a ms different.

      • Whydoyoucloseyoureyes

        thank you for the feedback! but there are cases where boot time tested on a specific motherboard can reveal quite a difference, for instance the intel 750 ssd has the slowest boot time of any high end ssd, while the sm951 supposedly has the absolute fastest of all consumer ssds. like several seconds difference actually.

        https://techreport.com/review/28050/intel-750-series-solid-state-drive-reviewed/5

      • I understand your point and appreciate the work that my friends at TechReport do. I have had every one of those SSDs in use in one system or another in one point in time or another and I have never experienced a 30 second boot. In fact, my system optimization is always the same and my start times are typically 15-20 seconds when fully optimized with our SSD Optimization Guide. There are VAST differences in boards and, as such, a significant start time difference will be experienced between newer NVME compatible boards and those of just yesterday that relied on Win 8.1 NVMe drivers alone. Similarly, to put a notebook SAta SSD, beside a PCIe 4 lane and then NVME, a few seconds difference can be expected. I understand your initial concern but, the way I have always looked at presenting SSDs to the consumer (and enterprise), I prefer to stay away from comparisons where the results of drives are really not that tangible in my opinion. The best part of it all is that there are several websites for comparison, or different benchmark characteristics to draw upon.

      • It would be interesting to understand a bit more about this variability in boot time. Dust off the ol’ SAS program and collect a large amount of data and get real nerdy with it!

    • I did, I booted off this SSD in about 7-8 seconds as stated under the bootability section in the review on the first page. The Intel 750 booted similarly as other SSDs as well when I had it.

      • Whydoyoucloseyoureyes

        i had the 750, it booted real slow, like stupid slow compared to my old 120gb corsair. i have the 850 pro now and its insane compared to the 750.

        Also i could not install hackintosh on my 750 which sucks , but hackintosh does have sm951 support 🙂

        I also have the asrock extreme6 so i can buy the sm951 and use it if i needed, but tbh the 850 pro in daily usage is just as fast. and the sm951 has throttling issues. try placing a fan over it and see if performance increase?

    • booted in 10 sec (i5+DDR 1600 Mhz+sm951 AHCI)

    • I posted my 2nd boot on Youtube the day I received the drive… sorry the video quality on my phone sucks, but you can see how long it takes!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRFyBqKCXkc

      If you want to see even faster Samsung drives in a 4-way mirror (2 column, 2 copy in Storage Spaces), look at my last post here… fastest SSD config I’ve ever seen:

      https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ad5fe5bc-715d-418d-92a4-3bdb94eb7948/pcie-ssd-storage-spaces-huge-read-performance-drop

  3. Hi Les,

    Thanks for the review.

    If you’re interested, there’s a newer version of AS-SSD (v1.8.5608.42992).

  4. allesichmacheichmacheesfurmich

    What is the issue with this thing that potentially bricks it with a secure erase?

  5. I would like to upgrade my Vaio pro 13 pcie SSD samsung xp941 to the new sm951 would this be compatible?

    • The AHCI version would be yes.

      • Muthukumar Natarajan

        Is this tested? Especially, does the SONY VAIO Pro 13 boot from SM951 (512GB)? Could you please point to anywhere wherein someone has it actually tested and the result available?
        I know, technically it should work, but don’t want to take a chance while I buy.
        Many Thanks!

      • Of course it will work but I would go for the newest 950 pro now.

      • Muthukumar Natarajan

        Sorry, I too know that technically it should work, but I was more looking for actual experience, especially regarding whether it Boots.

        Also, regarding the 950 Pro, I know it is based on NVMe, whereas the SONY VAIO Pro supports only AHCI as far as I know. So when you recommend 950 Pro for SONY VAIO Pro, how is it going to work?:
        1. By itself? (I wonder how) _OR_
        2. Any BIOS Update available for SONY VAIO Pro for NVMe support? _OR_
        3. Is 950 Pro by any chance backward compatible with AHCI (again, Bootable?)

        Thanks!

      • Woops my apologies; 950 pro will not work and the SM951 (AHCI version) will.

      • SM951 will not work in Pro13 people don’t waste your time and money like me. XP941 is best you can get for Pro 13 tried both in my Pro 13 other people having same problem with SM951 won’t work as bootable partition!

      • SM951 AHCI I mean

      • Why the SM951 AHCI not works in the vaio pro13 ? thanks.

  6. Question, what kind of a speed decrease can you expect to see on this drive if you use it on a PCIe Gen2 x4 slot instead of Gen3? My laptop only has a Gen2 x4, so am curious what kind of decrease I should expect from this ssd.

  7. Christopher Caruk

    Hello, I’m currently testing the 512GB AHCI and NVMe versions of the 951 on the PCIe 3.0 bus on an ASUS Z97i-plus. The NVMe is able to achieve the read speeds that you posted but I’m seeing a maximum of around 1100MB/s read speed on the AHCI variant. See comments here for more information: https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-sm951-m-2-pcie-ssd-review-256gb-nvme-performance/

    Could this be a limitation of the board or a misconfiguration of the PCI bus?

    Thanks
    Chris

  8. Thanks for the review! However, I’m not really seeing the value add here, particularly for the money they want, over a standard SATA SSD.

    • It is application specific my friend; what are your needs? The average user won’t see any difference whatsoever between the two drives, however, this becomes gold to a media professional. Faster transfer speeds means higher efficiency which means more work done and coin in the pocket/time for the family.

      • By all means, that makes a lot of sense. I’m just surprised from an enthusiast or consumer perspective since many motherboard manufacturers are now including M.2 slots into their socket 1151 motherboards. Guess I’ll hold off for another year or two.

  9. Just bought SM951 512gb AHCI to upgrade my Vaio Pro 13 but for some reason I can’t create partition when installing windows7 it gets stuck at partition screen the partition is there but windows won’t load on it. Just strange because before that I had SATA SSD AHCI. What I am missing? Tried Different Bios settings but no luck..

  10. Happy owner of a Lenovo Y700 17ISK (ideapad) that has this little beast inside set up as disk 1.
    Installation of windows 7 64 bit possible only when installing on 1Terra Western Digital disk 0 and then cloning with another program from inside windows to disk 1.
    But if partitioned as GUID (GPT) SATA AHCI boot and NTFS this little baby can really bring some difference to Windows experience even on an old OS…
    Counted from Lenovo screen on bootup till CTRL-ALT-DELTE screen only 6 seconds (most of which came from the Windows visual effects on Windows start up screen). Without effects it would need 2 or 3 seconds to get there… (Windows 2003 Server Domain login…)
    As for its use, Word in half a second, Mozilla in 1,5 seconds, outlook less than one second. I repeat Domain environment)… Forgot to mention ESET 64 bit with file protection activated… Blindingly fast disk if supported by system…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *