OCZ Trion 100 SSD Review (240GB/480GB/960GB)


The SSD Review uses benchmark software called PCMark Vantage x64 HDD Suite to create testing scenarios that might be used in the typical user experience. There are eight tests in all and the tests performed record the speed of data movement in MB/s to which they are then given a numerical score after all of the tests are complete. The simulations are as follows:

  • Windows Defender In Use
  • Streaming Data from storage in games such as Alan Wake which allows for massive worlds and riveting non-stop action
  • Importing digital photos into Windows Photo Gallery
  • Starting the Vista Operating System
  • Home Video editing with Movie Maker which can be very time consuming
  • Media Center which can handle video recording, time shifting and streaming from Windows media center to an extender such as Xbox
  • Cataloging a music library
  • Starting applications


PCMark Vantage gives us our first glimpse at real world performance. With overall scores around 75K-76K, the Trion 100 SSDs prove to offer very good consumer performance.  Most speeds exceeded 300MB/s and reached up to 439MB/s in the Windows Vista start up benchmark emphasizing the main reason to move to an SSD over a HDD.


OCZ Trion 100 240GB PCMark Vantage


OCZ Trion 100 480GB PCMark Vantage


OCZ Trion 100 960GB PCMark Vantage



For our last benchmark, we have decided to use PCMark 8 Extended Storage Workload in order to determine steady state throughput of the SSD. This software is the longest in our battery of tests and takes just under 18 hours per SSD. As this is a specialized component of PCMark 8 Professional, its final result is void of any colorful graphs or charts typical of the normal online results and deciphering the resulting excel file into an easily understood result takes several more hours.

There are 18 phases of testing throughout the entire run, 8 runs of the Degradation Phase, 5 runs of the Steady State Phase and 5 runs of the Recovery Phase. In each phase, several performance tests are run of 10 different software programs; Adobe After Effects, Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop Heavy and Photoshop Light, Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint and Word, as well as Battlefield 3 and World of Warcraft to cover the gaming element.

  • PRECONDITIONING -The entire SSD is filled twice sequentially with random data of a 128KB file size. The second run accounts for overprovisioning that would have escaped the first;
  • DEGRADATION PHASE – The SSD is hit with random writes of between 4KB and 1MB for 10 minutes and then a single pass performance test is done of each application. The cycle is repeated 8 times, and with each time, the duration of random writes increases by 5 minutes;
  • STEADY STATE PHASE – The drive is hit with random writes of between 4KB and 1MB for 45 minutes before each application is put through a performance test. This process is repeated 5 times;
  • RECOVERY PHASE – The SSD is allowed to idle for 5 minutes before and between performance tests of all applications. This is repeated 5 times which accounts for garbage collection; and
  • CLEANUP – The entire SSD is written with zero data at a write size of 128KB

In reading the results, the Degrade and Steady State phases represent heavy workload testing while the recovery phase represents typical consumer light workload testing.


As you can see, performance is recorded in terms of Bandwidth and Latency. Bandwidth (or throughput) represents the total throughput the drive is able to sustain during the tests during each phase. Latency, at least for the purposes of PCMark 8, takes on a different outlook and for this, we will term it ‘Total Storage Latency’. Typically, latency has been addressed as the time it takes for a command to be executed, or rather, the time from when the last command completed to the time that the next command started. This is shown below as ‘Average Latency’.

PCMark 8 provides a slightly different measurement, however, that we are terming as ‘Total Storage Latency’. This is represented as being the period from the time the last command was completed, until the time it took to complete the next task; the difference of course being that the execution of that task is included in ‘Total Storage Latency’. For both latency graphs, the same still exists where the lower the latency, the faster the responsiveness of the system will be. While both latency charts look very similar, the scale puts into perspective how just a few milliseconds can increase the length of time to complete multiple workloads.

For a more in-depth look into Latency, Bandwidth, and IOPS check out our primer article on them here.


These results show the total average bandwidth across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the higher the result the better.

PCMark 8 Average Bandwidth


These results show the average access time during the workloads across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the lower the result the better.

PCMark 8 Average Latency


These results show the total access time across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the lower the result the better.

PCMark 8 Total Latency

Due to an issue, we are currently only able to post up the results of the 240GB and 960GB capacities, however, we are currently re-benching the 480GB capacity and should have graphs up in the next day or two with its performance as well. Overall, performance is respectable. It isn’t a game changer, but actually performs pretty well throughout the heavy workload phases compared to the Samsung and SanDisk TLC SSDs. When it comes to the final phase, however, we can see that they show a bit better performance. When looking at these results, keep in mind that, while one SSD or capacity is slightly faster than another, if you were to put two systems side by side and use them, the differences wouldn’t be as much as these graphs would make you think. Many laptop users just use their laptops for web browsing and email. For that any SSD would be suitable, especially when it can speed up boot and resume times when you are on the run! Let’s continue on to some extra testing and our final thoughts.


  1. blank

    Haven’t seen write speeds that low since 840.
    Even if they price these really low they still have
    the “Friends don’t let friends OCZ” factor…………..

  2. blank

    This really needs to come down on price to make sense. Compiting products are faster, while costing the same or a little more.

    A 40€ for 120GB would be awsome 🙂

    • blank

      The 120GB is debuting right now at $49.99 on Newegg and you can easily get an additional $10 discount if you have an Amex card to pay with.

  3. blank

    I think the review overrates the performance.

    After some GB written the speed drops down to an awful level. My old Crucial M4 128GB have a rate ca. 190MB/s til it is completely full

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *