WD Blue 3D SSD & SanDisk Ultra 3D SSD Review (1TB) – Twins That Rival the Best


The SSD Review uses PCMark 8’s Storage test suite to create testing scenarios that might be used in the typical user experience. With 10 traces recorded from Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office and a selection of popular games, it covers some of the most popular light to heavy workloads. Unlike synthetic storage tests, the PCMark 8 Storage benchmark highlights real-world performance differences between storage devices. After an initial break-in cycle and three rounds of the testing, we are given a file score and bandwidth amount. The higher the score/bandwidth, the better the drive performs.



1TB WD Blue 3D SSD PCMark 8


1TB SanDisk Ultra 3D PCMark 8

In PCMark 8 the WD Blue 3D SSD scored 4993 points and averaged 296MB/s in bandwidth while the SanDisk Ultra 3D scored 4991 points and averaged 296MB/s.

WD Blue 3D SSD & SanDisk Ultra 3D PCMark 8 Av Speed Compared

With average bandwidths of 297MB/s once rounded up in PCMark 8, both these drives prove to be some of the fastest SATA SSDs out. They deliver performance just slightly lower than the Samsung 850 EVO and Toshiba OCZ VX500.


For our last benchmark, we have decided to use PCMark 8 Extended Storage Workload in order to determine steady state throughput of the SSD. This software is the longest in our battery of tests and takes just under 18 hours per SSD. As this is a specialized component of PCMark 8 Professional, its final result is void of any colorful graphs or charts typical of the normal online results and deciphering the resulting excel file into an easily understood result takes several more hours.

There are 18 phases of testing throughout the entire run, 8 runs of the Degradation Phase, 5 runs of the Steady State Phase and 5 runs of the Recovery Phase. In each phase, several performance tests are run of 10 different software programs; Adobe After Effects, Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop Heavy and Photoshop Light, Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint and Word, as well as Battlefield 3 and World of Warcraft to cover the gaming element.

  • PRECONDITIONING -The entire SSD is filled twice sequentially with random data of a 128KB file size. The second run accounts for overprovisioning that would have escaped the first;
  • DEGRADATION PHASE – The SSD is hit with random writes of between 4KB and 1MB for 10 minutes and then a single pass performance test is done of each application. The cycle is repeated 8 times, and with each time, the duration of random writes increases by 5 minutes;
  • STEADY STATE PHASE – The drive is hit with random writes of between 4KB and 1MB for 45 minutes before each application is put through a performance test. This process is repeated 5 times;
  • RECOVERY PHASE – The SSD is allowed to idle for 5 minutes before and between performance tests of all applications. This is repeated 5 times which accounts for garbage collection; and
  • CLEANUP – The entire SSD is written with zero data at a write size of 128KB

In reading the results, the Degrade and Steady State phases represent heavy workload testing while the recovery phase represents typical consumer light workload testing.


As you can see, performance is recorded in terms of Bandwidth and Latency. Bandwidth (or throughput) represents the total throughput the drive is able to sustain during the tests during each phase. Latency, at least for the purposes of PCMark 8, takes on a different outlook and for this, we will term it ‘Total Storage Latency’. Typically, latency has been addressed as the time it takes for a command to be executed, or rather, the time from when the last command completed to the time that the next command started. This is shown below as ‘Average Latency’.

PCMark 8 provides a slightly different measurement, however, that we are terming as ‘Total Storage Latency’. This is represented as being the period from the time the last command was completed until the time it took to complete the next task; the difference, of course, is that the execution of that task is included in ‘Total Storage Latency’. For both latency graphs, the same still exists where the lower the latency, the faster the responsiveness of the system will be. While both latency charts look very similar, the scale puts into perspective how just a few milliseconds can increase the length of time to complete multiple workloads.

For a more in-depth look at Latency, Bandwidth, and IOPS check out our primer article on them here.


These results show the total average bandwidth across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the higher the result the better.

WD Blue 3D SSD & SanDisk Ultra 3D PCMark 8 AB


These results show the average access time during the workloads across all tests in the 18 phases. In this graph the lower the result the better.

WD Blue 3D SSD & SanDisk Ultra 3D PCMark 8 AL

With all previous tests considered, it is no shock to see that these SSDs deliver great consistency in PCMark 8’s extended run. Not only are they some of the fastest SSDs in the charts above during the recovery section, the part that matters most to represent how the drive should perform in a standard desktop environment, they are also some of the best SSDs for heavy workloads (degrade and steady state phases), with results similar to the Toshiba OCZ VX500!


  1. blank

    Great-With 3D reaching the market,perhaps the “race to the bottom” is over.
    And we can send planer TLC and ram-less drives off to silicon heaven.

    Pretty please, can we get a review of the 250 size.

  2. blank

    HOW will we know we are getting new stock rather than old slow stock?? is there a model number or suchlike? they are highly priced in the uk 90gbp for 250gb

  3. blank

    Shouldn’t they be called 3D SSDDD ?

  4. blank

    Is there compatibility for Dell Inspiron 14 3421?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *