<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Patriot Wildfire SATA 3 SSD Performance Testing &#8211; Anvil Storage Solutions and ATTO	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/raid-enterprise/patriot-memory-wildfire-120-gb-ssd-review-anvil-storage-solutions-and-atto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/raid-enterprise/patriot-memory-wildfire-120-gb-ssd-review-anvil-storage-solutions-and-atto/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bumblefoot2004		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/raid-enterprise/patriot-memory-wildfire-120-gb-ssd-review-anvil-storage-solutions-and-atto/#comment-7867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bumblefoot2004]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24912#comment-7867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/raid-enterprise/patriot-memory-wildfire-120-gb-ssd-review-anvil-storage-solutions-and-atto/#comment-7866&quot;&gt;bumblefoot2004&lt;/a&gt;.

* I&#039;m talking about the ATTO and HD Tune results. If the C300 SSDs can reach 2.77 GB/s reads and 1.84 GB/s reads, I expected the Wildfires to get much higher. What am I missing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/raid-enterprise/patriot-memory-wildfire-120-gb-ssd-review-anvil-storage-solutions-and-atto/#comment-7866">bumblefoot2004</a>.</p>
<p>* I&#8217;m talking about the ATTO and HD Tune results. If the C300 SSDs can reach 2.77 GB/s reads and 1.84 GB/s reads, I expected the Wildfires to get much higher. What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bumblefoot2004		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/raid-enterprise/patriot-memory-wildfire-120-gb-ssd-review-anvil-storage-solutions-and-atto/#comment-7866</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bumblefoot2004]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24912#comment-7866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it strange that the 8 Patriot SSDs, which are supposed to be much faster in reads and writes than the Crucial C300 SSDs turn in slower benchmark speeds. I am thinking about buying a Maingear Shift with an 9265-8i card with 8 Patriot Wildfire SSDs, so this discrepancy is disconcerting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it strange that the 8 Patriot SSDs, which are supposed to be much faster in reads and writes than the Crucial C300 SSDs turn in slower benchmark speeds. I am thinking about buying a Maingear Shift with an 9265-8i card with 8 Patriot Wildfire SSDs, so this discrepancy is disconcerting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
