<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: WD Black SN750 Review M.2 NVMe SSD Review (1TB) &#8211; Enthusiast Class Performance Revisited	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of Clear		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/#comment-24531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of Clear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=100791#comment-24531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/#comment-24530&quot;&gt;ETB&lt;/a&gt;.

I mean, every other professional review shows what happens when the SLC cache buffers are exhausted. The thing is, it&#039;s not easy to do. It takes software written just to saturate 30+ queue depths at speeds greater than 3.8GB/s. The majority of consumers could never do this. Certain workstation workloads can, but those people are generally looking at MLC based SSDs.

You state that operations can be prolonged by 200%. 200% of what, exactly?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/#comment-24530">ETB</a>.</p>
<p>I mean, every other professional review shows what happens when the SLC cache buffers are exhausted. The thing is, it&#8217;s not easy to do. It takes software written just to saturate 30+ queue depths at speeds greater than 3.8GB/s. The majority of consumers could never do this. Certain workstation workloads can, but those people are generally looking at MLC based SSDs.</p>
<p>You state that operations can be prolonged by 200%. 200% of what, exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ETB		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/#comment-24530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ETB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=100791#comment-24530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You Said you were going to address the slc cache and potential problems when exceeding it...  ?? 
In every test I see, in real world testing you always stay below that magical slc cache limit, so these drives come out of it looking very good. It&#039;s a bit disappointing because I use a lot of different drives for different purposes and I have not found 1 single TLC drive that shows good sustained sequential speed e.g. Yet review after review, these drives are touted as &quot;just as good&quot; as 970 pro or similar. I guess it comes down to workflow or particular needs of the user. As an example I just bought a jms583 10Gps pcb and a &quot;thumb&quot; drive enclosure for it. Using a thermal pad to dissipate the heat through the aluminium enclosure, even with a Usb 3 host I can sustain ~usb3.0 limit for the whole transfer using an excellent mlc drive. With a tlc drive, the speed drops off so badly after the cache is full, that it prolongs your transfer operation by maybe 200%. Now the same would be true for situations where you generally were working with massive amounts of data.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Said you were going to address the slc cache and potential problems when exceeding it&#8230;  ??<br />
In every test I see, in real world testing you always stay below that magical slc cache limit, so these drives come out of it looking very good. It&#8217;s a bit disappointing because I use a lot of different drives for different purposes and I have not found 1 single TLC drive that shows good sustained sequential speed e.g. Yet review after review, these drives are touted as &#8220;just as good&#8221; as 970 pro or similar. I guess it comes down to workflow or particular needs of the user. As an example I just bought a jms583 10Gps pcb and a &#8220;thumb&#8221; drive enclosure for it. Using a thermal pad to dissipate the heat through the aluminium enclosure, even with a Usb 3 host I can sustain ~usb3.0 limit for the whole transfer using an excellent mlc drive. With a tlc drive, the speed drops off so badly after the cache is full, that it prolongs your transfer operation by maybe 200%. Now the same would be true for situations where you generally were working with massive amounts of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of Clear		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/wd-black-sn750-review-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-1tb-enthusiast-class-performance-revisited/#comment-24528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of Clear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=100791#comment-24528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;WD speaks to SLC cache technology which we discussed in most recent reports.  For the most part, this is sold as the reason for SSD performance gain, however, its use is twofold with respect to the newer 3D TLC memory as it is required to reach those performance benchmarks, unlike previous SSDs.&quot;

I think it should be pointed out that SLC caching has existed in every SSD utilizing TLC NAND since its advent, including planar 2D TLC flash. The ADATA SU800, for example, (released in 2016) utilizes a massive dynamic cache buffer due to what was originally an immature controller (SM2258) and the Micron 32-layer 384-Gbit TLC NAND, which is very slow stuff.

In addition, SLC caching algorithms increase endurance, often substantially.

pSLC caching is one part of the reason that 3D TLC surpassed 2D MLC in endurance (substantially) and peak performance, while increasing density; very important for consumers of all types, as MLC is significantly more expensive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;WD speaks to SLC cache technology which we discussed in most recent reports.  For the most part, this is sold as the reason for SSD performance gain, however, its use is twofold with respect to the newer 3D TLC memory as it is required to reach those performance benchmarks, unlike previous SSDs.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it should be pointed out that SLC caching has existed in every SSD utilizing TLC NAND since its advent, including planar 2D TLC flash. The ADATA SU800, for example, (released in 2016) utilizes a massive dynamic cache buffer due to what was originally an immature controller (SM2258) and the Micron 32-layer 384-Gbit TLC NAND, which is very slow stuff.</p>
<p>In addition, SLC caching algorithms increase endurance, often substantially.</p>
<p>pSLC caching is one part of the reason that 3D TLC surpassed 2D MLC in endurance (substantially) and peak performance, while increasing density; very important for consumers of all types, as MLC is significantly more expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
