<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LSI SAS 9207-8i PCIe 3.0 HBA Overview &#8211; Eight Crucial M4 SSDs Pushed to 4.1GB/s Performance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 May 2014 17:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Narayan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-19078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Narayan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2014 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=53323#comment-19078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seems like most people want details of how the drives were configured so they can either try to do the tests themselves or just gain from the added transparency.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like most people want details of how the drives were configured so they can either try to do the tests themselves or just gain from the added transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ErikL		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-15114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ErikL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=53323#comment-15114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Could you provide the settings you uses for the raid strip? i.e Strip Size,, Read Policy,Write Policy, IO etc. I just purchased this card and have been playing with configures to get an optimum result.
thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you provide the settings you uses for the raid strip? i.e Strip Size,, Read Policy,Write Policy, IO etc. I just purchased this card and have been playing with configures to get an optimum result.<br />
thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-14164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=53323#comment-14164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a clarification that needs to be made in this article.

The theoretical raw bit rate of PCIe 2.0 is around 4GB/s. PCIe is a packet-based store-and-forward protocol, so there&#039;s packet overhead that limits the theoretical data transfer rate.

At stock settings, this overhead is 20%. However, one can increase the size of PCIe packets to decrease this overhead significantly (to around ~3-5%) in BIOS.

I know this because I&#039;ve raided eight 128GB Samsung 840 Pro with the LSI MegaRAID 9271-8iCC on a PCIe 2.0 motherboard, and I&#039;ve hit this limit on sequential reads. In order to get around it, I raised the PCIe packet size, but doing so increases latency and may cause stuttering issues with some GPUs if raised too high.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a clarification that needs to be made in this article.</p>
<p>The theoretical raw bit rate of PCIe 2.0 is around 4GB/s. PCIe is a packet-based store-and-forward protocol, so there&#8217;s packet overhead that limits the theoretical data transfer rate.</p>
<p>At stock settings, this overhead is 20%. However, one can increase the size of PCIe packets to decrease this overhead significantly (to around ~3-5%) in BIOS.</p>
<p>I know this because I&#8217;ve raided eight 128GB Samsung 840 Pro with the LSI MegaRAID 9271-8iCC on a PCIe 2.0 motherboard, and I&#8217;ve hit this limit on sequential reads. In order to get around it, I raised the PCIe packet size, but doing so increases latency and may cause stuttering issues with some GPUs if raised too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ferky		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-13899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=53323#comment-13899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great review ! Very nice to see suvh great info on this subject.
BTW does this HBA support Trim ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review ! Very nice to see suvh great info on this subject.<br />
BTW does this HBA support Trim ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GregChernis		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-13876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregChernis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=53323#comment-13876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-13669&quot;&gt;Christopher Ryan&lt;/a&gt;.

I had a chance to try SoftRAID0 on IT firmware, RAID0 with IR firmware, and 9286-8i RAID0, all with Intel 520 480GB SSD.  All configurations are speed-limited at 5 drives since I am rinning PCIe 2.0 x8.  Time for a new motherboard, I guess...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/lsi-sas-9207-8i-pcie-3-0-host-bus-adapter-quick-preview/#comment-13669">Christopher Ryan</a>.</p>
<p>I had a chance to try SoftRAID0 on IT firmware, RAID0 with IR firmware, and 9286-8i RAID0, all with Intel 520 480GB SSD.  All configurations are speed-limited at 5 drives since I am rinning PCIe 2.0 x8.  Time for a new motherboard, I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
