<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Samsung 990 Pro SSD Review &#8211; Samsung Reigns True Yet Again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Fishman		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-87522</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fishman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106239#comment-87522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HI,
I`m getting  4928,6 MB/s read and 5261.61 write RND4K Q32T16 after turning virtualization in bios. You are far faster... What did you optimize in windows??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI,<br />
I`m getting  4928,6 MB/s read and 5261.61 write RND4K Q32T16 after turning virtualization in bios. You are far faster&#8230; What did you optimize in windows??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edd		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-64591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106239#comment-64591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[100MB random reads?  Thats huge speed. Unbelievable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100MB random reads?  Thats huge speed. Unbelievable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: compvter		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[compvter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106239#comment-63650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63168&quot;&gt;Arlindo&lt;/a&gt;.

That is basically same as asking if it is worth to buy pcie 4 gpu over pcie 5 gpu. It really depends on product and your use case. I would argue that you might see some improvement on games using direct storage, but there are a lot of if:s in that.  I would also argue that you see noticeable difference on windows startup time if you go for  intel optane 905  which is gen 3 vs any pcie 5 currently on the market. That has like 3x higher 4k read performance. Interface just enabled higher transfer speed, you need something on the other end that can actually use the available bandwidth on the other end. 14GB/s is not really worth it if device can do 100MB/s at 4k file size if that is your primary need. Personally I think pcie 5 SSD is waste of money because most use cases require higher small file reads, which are currently somewhere between 50MB/s and 350MB/s. Most SSD:s are below 100MB/s and optane:s were at bit above 300MB/s. Sadly Intel could not market them properly as they have max transfer speed below 3GB/s, while Samsung 990 is above 7GB/s. It is pretty hard for marketing team to say Intel one would be faster on overall use when most people just look at max transfer speed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63168">Arlindo</a>.</p>
<p>That is basically same as asking if it is worth to buy pcie 4 gpu over pcie 5 gpu. It really depends on product and your use case. I would argue that you might see some improvement on games using direct storage, but there are a lot of if:s in that.  I would also argue that you see noticeable difference on windows startup time if you go for  intel optane 905  which is gen 3 vs any pcie 5 currently on the market. That has like 3x higher 4k read performance. Interface just enabled higher transfer speed, you need something on the other end that can actually use the available bandwidth on the other end. 14GB/s is not really worth it if device can do 100MB/s at 4k file size if that is your primary need. Personally I think pcie 5 SSD is waste of money because most use cases require higher small file reads, which are currently somewhere between 50MB/s and 350MB/s. Most SSD:s are below 100MB/s and optane:s were at bit above 300MB/s. Sadly Intel could not market them properly as they have max transfer speed below 3GB/s, while Samsung 990 is above 7GB/s. It is pretty hard for marketing team to say Intel one would be faster on overall use when most people just look at max transfer speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les Tokar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Tokar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 13:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106239#comment-63171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63168&quot;&gt;Arlindo&lt;/a&gt;.

For every day use for the average user any SSD would work.  There isn&#039;t an expert in the world that can tell the difference in any SSD during typical everyday use.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63168">Arlindo</a>.</p>
<p>For every day use for the average user any SSD would work.  There isn&#8217;t an expert in the world that can tell the difference in any SSD during typical everyday use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arlindo		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-990pro-gen-4-ssd-series-review-samsung-reigns-true-yet-again/#comment-63168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arlindo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 09:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106239#comment-63168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the everyday use of an average user, is there any significant difference between Gen 4 NVMe SSD and Gen 5? Is it worth the expected price difference?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the everyday use of an average user, is there any significant difference between Gen 4 NVMe SSD and Gen 5? Is it worth the expected price difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
