<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kingston KC3000 PCIe 4.0 NVME SSD Review &#8211; Did Kingston Just Release a &#8216;Game&#8217; Changer?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 12:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Elias		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-64505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 12:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105518#comment-64505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It does throttle. Awefully. Computer almost comes to complete halt. Has taken me 12 months to figure this out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does throttle. Awefully. Computer almost comes to complete halt. Has taken me 12 months to figure this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Stoica		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-61554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Stoica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105518#comment-61554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you have any idea why my Random 4k write is limited to 250k ? instead of 1000k as Kingston claims... ?
I do use a Gen3 m2 slot but the random read/write speeds shouldn&#039;t be affected.
Also my random read speed is close to 700k, still way more than the read speed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any idea why my Random 4k write is limited to 250k ? instead of 1000k as Kingston claims&#8230; ?<br />
I do use a Gen3 m2 slot but the random read/write speeds shouldn&#8217;t be affected.<br />
Also my random read speed is close to 700k, still way more than the read speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gabe		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-61528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105518#comment-61528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great review! Regarding the addition of a more powerful heat sink, did you remove the grapheme aluminum heat spreader and then attach a more powerful heat sink or did you put the new heat sink right on top of the graphene aluminum heat spreader? We are assembling a QNAP NAS device using 2 Kingston KC3000 M.2 drives. This NAS will be the primary storage device where VMs and network shares are stored. There is plenty of space inside the QNAP to attach a rather tall heat sink onto these M.2s, so we are considering the SABRENT M.2 2280 SSD Rocket Heatsink (SB-HTSK). Any thoughts or recommendations? Thank you for your time and consideration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review! Regarding the addition of a more powerful heat sink, did you remove the grapheme aluminum heat spreader and then attach a more powerful heat sink or did you put the new heat sink right on top of the graphene aluminum heat spreader? We are assembling a QNAP NAS device using 2 Kingston KC3000 M.2 drives. This NAS will be the primary storage device where VMs and network shares are stored. There is plenty of space inside the QNAP to attach a rather tall heat sink onto these M.2s, so we are considering the SABRENT M.2 2280 SSD Rocket Heatsink (SB-HTSK). Any thoughts or recommendations? Thank you for your time and consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-60751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105518#comment-60751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Les, please, pretty please, with sugar on top... Test such modern SSDs, like this one, on PCIe3 as well. Not on new motherboards but on &quot;standard&quot; stuff, on the usual iron that people have at home.

Cause, if the low QD performance of such modern drive is due to fast controller/NAND and not strictly PCIe4 spec, a lot of people would be interested in buying such PCIe4 SSDs to install in their laptops/desktops that only have PCIe3 M2, as it would translate in double the storage performance in real life.
(by real life I mean decent QD of 1-4, not 32)

If this drive keeps its QD 1-4 performance on PCIe3, I wouldn&#039;t care that it can&#039;t exceed 3.5GB/s because of the PCIe3 spec, I&#039;d be happy that it&#039;s two times faster than any PCIe3 drive in real life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Les, please, pretty please, with sugar on top&#8230; Test such modern SSDs, like this one, on PCIe3 as well. Not on new motherboards but on &#8220;standard&#8221; stuff, on the usual iron that people have at home.</p>
<p>Cause, if the low QD performance of such modern drive is due to fast controller/NAND and not strictly PCIe4 spec, a lot of people would be interested in buying such PCIe4 SSDs to install in their laptops/desktops that only have PCIe3 M2, as it would translate in double the storage performance in real life.<br />
(by real life I mean decent QD of 1-4, not 32)</p>
<p>If this drive keeps its QD 1-4 performance on PCIe3, I wouldn&#8217;t care that it can&#8217;t exceed 3.5GB/s because of the PCIe3 spec, I&#8217;d be happy that it&#8217;s two times faster than any PCIe3 drive in real life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les Tokar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-60726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Tokar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105518#comment-60726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-60725&quot;&gt;netmann&lt;/a&gt;.

Kingston is selling its premium product no different than Samsung, Sabrent, TeamGroup, WD, Seagate, Mushkin and Silicon Power have so let&#039;s try to avoid the &#039;shock and awe&#039; comments. As we have done with several products, we have provided our thoughts on temperature in the same fashion we typically do, adding a bit more emphasis as this drive has a heat spreader, most likely for normal use or that of a PS5.  Our testing is as intensive as it gets and so I added that we needed the larger heatsink for heat concerns. We prefer the lowest temps for our testing.  I don&#039;t recall mentioning thermal throttling whatsoever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/kingston-kc3000-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review/#comment-60725">netmann</a>.</p>
<p>Kingston is selling its premium product no different than Samsung, Sabrent, TeamGroup, WD, Seagate, Mushkin and Silicon Power have so let&#8217;s try to avoid the &#8216;shock and awe&#8217; comments. As we have done with several products, we have provided our thoughts on temperature in the same fashion we typically do, adding a bit more emphasis as this drive has a heat spreader, most likely for normal use or that of a PS5.  Our testing is as intensive as it gets and so I added that we needed the larger heatsink for heat concerns. We prefer the lowest temps for our testing.  I don&#8217;t recall mentioning thermal throttling whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
