<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intel SSD DC P3608 Review (1.6TB) &#8211; Over 5GB/s and 850K IOPS!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dravo1		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dravo1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=89092#comment-22435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22420&quot;&gt;dravo1&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ve been informed that PCIe hardware RAID will be available on the Skylake CPU and the Xeon version when it comes out later. Now we&#039;re talking.........]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22420">dravo1</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been informed that PCIe hardware RAID will be available on the Skylake CPU and the Xeon version when it comes out later. Now we&#8217;re talking&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dravo1		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dravo1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=89092#comment-22420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22358&quot;&gt;Sean Webster&lt;/a&gt;.

As an enterprise product I can see it as a high-end workstation device but not a server device. The lack of RAIDability seems to limit its use to caching and high-speed scratch work area.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22358">Sean Webster</a>.</p>
<p>As an enterprise product I can see it as a high-end workstation device but not a server device. The lack of RAIDability seems to limit its use to caching and high-speed scratch work area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean Webster		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Webster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=89092#comment-22383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22378&quot;&gt;Luke&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t have access to those drives. We reviewed the P3700 in another system. Because of that as well as a change in our testing methodology, we cant not graph them side by side. Looking at the P3700&#039;s specific review you can gauge for yourself the approximate performance difference between the two.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22378">Luke</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have access to those drives. We reviewed the P3700 in another system. Because of that as well as a change in our testing methodology, we cant not graph them side by side. Looking at the P3700&#8217;s specific review you can gauge for yourself the approximate performance difference between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luke		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=89092#comment-22378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so this is a preview, not a review... where are the comparisons to P3700 and PM951?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so this is a preview, not a review&#8230; where are the comparisons to P3700 and PM951?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul D		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=89092#comment-22359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22358&quot;&gt;Sean Webster&lt;/a&gt;.

More than likely next year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-dc-p3608-review-1-6tb-over-5gbs-and-850k-iops/#comment-22358">Sean Webster</a>.</p>
<p>More than likely next year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
