<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Crucial V4 256GB SSD Review &#8211; All Is Not SATA 3 Just Yet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: genef113		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-22745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[genef113]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=56429#comment-22745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was shocked at the performance of this V4 SSD.  It is very similar to a spinning HDD and is the slowest SSD I have encountered.  Shame on Crucial for ever releasing such a dullard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked at the performance of this V4 SSD.  It is very similar to a spinning HDD and is the slowest SSD I have encountered.  Shame on Crucial for ever releasing such a dullard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kris		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-15145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=56429#comment-15145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The V4 256gb version is HORRIBLE at multitasking and cannot perform a replay service which is a relatively lite read sample, smoothly! I am hugely disappointed with this ssd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The V4 256gb version is HORRIBLE at multitasking and cannot perform a replay service which is a relatively lite read sample, smoothly! I am hugely disappointed with this ssd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EGuitarStar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-13046</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EGuitarStar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=56429#comment-13046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just purchased thw 256GB model and installed as an OS drive on my Macbook and it has worse performance than a HDD. Try multitasking with real world use and you&#039;ll see how dire the drive is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just purchased thw 256GB model and installed as an OS drive on my Macbook and it has worse performance than a HDD. Try multitasking with real world use and you&#8217;ll see how dire the drive is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ssdfreak		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-12601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ssdfreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=56429#comment-12601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-12545&quot;&gt;Michael&lt;/a&gt;.

m4 is sata3 which is backwards compatible with sata 2. sata 2 itself is backwards compatible with Sata1. if your mac is sata1 you should go with v4 and not m4]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-12545">Michael</a>.</p>
<p>m4 is sata3 which is backwards compatible with sata 2. sata 2 itself is backwards compatible with Sata1. if your mac is sata1 you should go with v4 and not m4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-v4-256gb-ssd-review-all-is-not-sata-3-just-yet/#comment-12545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=56429#comment-12545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m afraid I&#039;ve gotten a little lost in the technical details here, if someone doesn&#039;t mind helping a brother out! I have a 2008 white Macbook (SATA) and want to upgrade to SSD. Is there a reason why I would pick the V4 over the M4 if not for a slightly cheaper price at this time? Or is there some reason I should consider the M4 over the V4? And, do I need any special mounting hardware or will it plug into the existing slot in my laptop? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ve gotten a little lost in the technical details here, if someone doesn&#8217;t mind helping a brother out! I have a 2008 white Macbook (SATA) and want to upgrade to SSD. Is there a reason why I would pick the V4 over the M4 if not for a slightly cheaper price at this time? Or is there some reason I should consider the M4 over the V4? And, do I need any special mounting hardware or will it plug into the existing slot in my laptop? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
