Comments on: Corsair Force Series GT 120GB SATA 3 SSD Review – Data Types, ATTO and Crystal DiskMark Testing https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/corsair-force-series-gt-120gb-sata-3-ssd-review-data-types-atto-and-crystal-diskmark-testing/ The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource | Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Les Tokar https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/corsair-force-series-gt-120gb-sata-3-ssd-review-data-types-atto-and-crystal-diskmark-testing/#comment-7942 Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:24:00 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=20849#comment-7942 In reply to Antonio Biacchi.

Thats odd. The best advise I can give is to first test with ATTO and then do your Crystal Tests again in safe mode. If the numbers get alot better in safe mode, the OS is the cause of the problem

]]> By: Antonio Biacchi https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/corsair-force-series-gt-120gb-sata-3-ssd-review-data-types-atto-and-crystal-diskmark-testing/#comment-7939 Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:19:00 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=20849#comment-7939 Good day, I have this same model SSD, almost the same configuration, the motherboard is a GIGABYTE Z68X-UD7-B3, and testing is only 360Mb x 160MB, I noticed a big difference in the tests there, made ??in CrystalMark 506Mb x 483Mb, among other program that’s well below, have any tips, big hug …

]]>