<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ASRock Ultra Quad M.2 Card Review &#8211; 4 x M.2 SSD RAID at 10GB/s and 932K IOPS	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 21:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CAMERON C CAFFEE		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-63628</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAMERON C CAFFEE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 21:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=97838#comment-63628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will Asrock Z690 PG RipTide support this card ? If yes, any limitations ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Asrock Z690 PG RipTide support this card ? If yes, any limitations ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24396</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=97838#comment-24396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24395&quot;&gt;Tyler V&lt;/a&gt;.

TRIM support except RAID 5...but much more expensive. (links to sales included)

https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/highpoint-ssd7101a-1-nvme-raid-controller-review-samsung-toshiba-m-2-ssds-tested/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24395">Tyler V</a>.</p>
<p>TRIM support except RAID 5&#8230;but much more expensive. (links to sales included)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/highpoint-ssd7101a-1-nvme-raid-controller-review-samsung-toshiba-m-2-ssds-tested/" rel="ugc">https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/highpoint-ssd7101a-1-nvme-raid-controller-review-samsung-toshiba-m-2-ssds-tested/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyler V		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24395</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=97838#comment-24395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24394&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

I was considering using some NVME (Toshiba, Samsung or maybe the new 700 drives from Intel) in raid as a scratch disk. I&#039;ve been using Sata SSD&#039;s in raid with trim and they perform really well but I&#039;m only writing about 80MB/s and do a lot of write/erase even during the writing as it is. I&#039;d be writing double if I decided to get M.2 drives.. unfortunately Sata SSD prices are increasing in price due to flash prices and maybe losing &quot;popularity&quot; compared to other options available now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24394">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>I was considering using some NVME (Toshiba, Samsung or maybe the new 700 drives from Intel) in raid as a scratch disk. I&#8217;ve been using Sata SSD&#8217;s in raid with trim and they perform really well but I&#8217;m only writing about 80MB/s and do a lot of write/erase even during the writing as it is. I&#8217;d be writing double if I decided to get M.2 drives.. unfortunately Sata SSD prices are increasing in price due to flash prices and maybe losing &#8220;popularity&#8221; compared to other options available now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24394</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=97838#comment-24394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24393&quot;&gt;Tyler V&lt;/a&gt;.

Not sure why it is disappointing when one considers the efficiency of GC and less importance of TRIM these days.  The drive was made for Intel drives and VROC first and foremost...that is its ideal answer where there is no trim concerns whatsoever....and it is bootable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24393">Tyler V</a>.</p>
<p>Not sure why it is disappointing when one considers the efficiency of GC and less importance of TRIM these days.  The drive was made for Intel drives and VROC first and foremost&#8230;that is its ideal answer where there is no trim concerns whatsoever&#8230;.and it is bootable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyler V		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24393</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=97838#comment-24393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24392&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s kind of disappointing thanks for answering though]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asrock-ultra-quad-m-2-card-review-4-x-m-2-ssd-raid-at-10gb-s-and-932k-iops/#comment-24392">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of disappointing thanks for answering though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
