<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Crucial Creates the Worlds Smallest 8TB Portable SSD&#8230; and We Have This X10 In For Testing &#8211; Computex 2025 Flash Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cbfagl		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/#comment-95548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cbfagl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=109459#comment-95548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thats interesting ... i saw this, the date, and looked the one i bought october 2024.
apparently changing the specs and chip of a consumer ssd isnt enough to release a new branding
the only obvious difference is the model number:
new - CT2000X10SSD9-02
old - CT2000X10PROSSD902

well.  atleast it drives down the price of the older ones temporarily until they are out of stock]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats interesting &#8230; i saw this, the date, and looked the one i bought october 2024.<br />
apparently changing the specs and chip of a consumer ssd isnt enough to release a new branding<br />
the only obvious difference is the model number:<br />
new &#8211; CT2000X10SSD9-02<br />
old &#8211; CT2000X10PROSSD902</p>
<p>well.  atleast it drives down the price of the older ones temporarily until they are out of stock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les Tokar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/#comment-94951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Tokar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 06:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=109459#comment-94951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/#comment-94948&quot;&gt;James Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for the comment and the link has been fixed.  We don&#039;t quite understand this, &quot;As well, the mention of the 6TB capacity is the only one in the article. It’s a weird call out when the rest of the article seems to be about the 8TB model specifically.&quot;  The article is based on our sample 2TB X10. The 8TB is highlighted as there is not another portable SSD of this size and that capacity.  The only time we mention 6TB is in stating that, at the time of the report, that is the only capacity not available for sale.  Thanks again for jumping in!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/#comment-94948">James Smith</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment and the link has been fixed.  We don&#8217;t quite understand this, &#8220;As well, the mention of the 6TB capacity is the only one in the article. It’s a weird call out when the rest of the article seems to be about the 8TB model specifically.&#8221;  The article is based on our sample 2TB X10. The 8TB is highlighted as there is not another portable SSD of this size and that capacity.  The only time we mention 6TB is in stating that, at the time of the report, that is the only capacity not available for sale.  Thanks again for jumping in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Smith		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/hardware/portable-ssds/crucial-creates-the-worlds-smallest-8tb-portable-ssd-and-we-have-it-on-the-test-bench-computex-2025-flash-update/#comment-94948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 05:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=109459#comment-94948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The newest Crucial X10 is already available on Amazon and priced at $139.99 (1TB), $249.99 (2TB), $395.99 (4TB), and $779.99 (8TB) with no availability for the 6TB capacity at the time of this report.&quot;

Quick note that the Amazon link in this sentence has the color of a link but is plain text.  As well, the mention of the 6TB capacity is the only one in the article.  It&#039;s a weird call out when the rest of the article seems to be about the 8TB model specifically.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The newest Crucial X10 is already available on Amazon and priced at $139.99 (1TB), $249.99 (2TB), $395.99 (4TB), and $779.99 (8TB) with no availability for the 6TB capacity at the time of this report.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quick note that the Amazon link in this sentence has the color of a link but is plain text.  As well, the mention of the 6TB capacity is the only one in the article.  It&#8217;s a weird call out when the rest of the article seems to be about the 8TB model specifically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
