<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SK Hynix Announces Next-Generation 64GB UFS (Universal Flash Storage) 2.0 Solution Based On Their Own 16nm NAND	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88149#comment-22028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22025&quot;&gt;Sean Webster&lt;/a&gt;.

I suppose that makes sense.


But from a cost standpoint, it would make more sense to have onfi/toggle interface on the phones/tablet/etc pcb and let the SoC do the NAND managment. That way you have cheaper NAND and i suppose better selection on the market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22025">Sean Webster</a>.</p>
<p>I suppose that makes sense.</p>
<p>But from a cost standpoint, it would make more sense to have onfi/toggle interface on the phones/tablet/etc pcb and let the SoC do the NAND managment. That way you have cheaper NAND and i suppose better selection on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean Webster		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Webster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88149#comment-22025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22017&quot;&gt;Benjamin Hojnik&lt;/a&gt;.

It is managed NAND meaning that it has the controller and interface built in. Overall, it is also a smaller design for mobile devices such as phones, tablets, GPS, etc. UFS is like the next gen of eMMC and both use less power than standard SSDs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22017">Benjamin Hojnik</a>.</p>
<p>It is managed NAND meaning that it has the controller and interface built in. Overall, it is also a smaller design for mobile devices such as phones, tablets, GPS, etc. UFS is like the next gen of eMMC and both use less power than standard SSDs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/sk-hynix-announces-next-generation-64gb-ufs-universal-flash-storage-2-0-solution-based-on-their-own-16nm-nand/#comment-22017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88149#comment-22017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why do the even bother with another interface ?

Why dont SoC manufactureres and NAND makers move to pci-e entirely ?
You have much better speeds, much much better random performance and an already known interface.

Is eMMC/UFS less complex or uses less power ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the even bother with another interface ?</p>
<p>Why dont SoC manufactureres and NAND makers move to pci-e entirely ?<br />
You have much better speeds, much much better random performance and an already known interface.</p>
<p>Is eMMC/UFS less complex or uses less power ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
