Yeah, it is q pro.

Really, i was just trying to show this drives weakness. Its not just great numbers most review show you. In some situations, such poor consistency could really be annoying.

Seeing how both drives cost the same and have the same warranty, its up to the buyer which tradeoffs he can take 🙂

After some more research I found the review that your link
is to. the review seemed to be atleast 95% positive, and this was with it compared to the Samsung 840 Pro. And yes your link is to the Q Series Pro, not the HG6 series, my bad.

I clicked on the link and looked at the Toshiba part number and it looks like its a different ssd from the Toshiba Q Series Pro. Am I missing something? Your link is to the HG6 series.

Because its not all about raw/peak numbers.
Yes, arc 100 has lower peak performance, but will flat out destroy toshiba in performance consistency thanks to its newer controller, dram buffer! and bigger overprovisioning.

This shows it all
https://www.cdrlabs.com/images/stories/reviews/toshiba_q_series_pro_ssd/toshiba%20q%20series%20pro%20256gb%20hd%20tach%20dirty.png

The fact that it achieves these numbers without dram buffers
shows how much faster the nand is. it’s a plus not a minus.