<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OWC Shows Off 2013 Mac PCIe Custom LSI SandForce Driven SSD Upgrade Capable of 1.8GB/s &#8211; CES 2014 Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:52:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/#comment-18003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=76374#comment-18003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/#comment-18002&quot;&gt;dravo1&lt;/a&gt;.

SandForce is definitely not being put on the backburner as branding identification but companies are getting a bit more leeway at times to have the branding as they like (ie Intel/LSI 1500 Pro M.2 posted yesterday)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/#comment-18002">dravo1</a>.</p>
<p>SandForce is definitely not being put on the backburner as branding identification but companies are getting a bit more leeway at times to have the branding as they like (ie Intel/LSI 1500 Pro M.2 posted yesterday)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dravo1		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/#comment-18002</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dravo1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=76374#comment-18002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I noticed the Griffin chip has the LSI branding on it. Is the SandForce branding pretty much done with?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the Griffin chip has the LSI branding on it. Is the SandForce branding pretty much done with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zaxx		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/owc-shows-2014-mac-pcie-custom-lsi-sandforce-driven-ssd-upgrade-capable-1-8gbs-ces-2013-update/#comment-17994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=76374#comment-17994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Capable of 1.8GB/s read and WRITE&#039;...??? Haven&#039;t seen a single write bench from anyone bragging about their 3700 based drive...grrr]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Capable of 1.8GB/s read and WRITE&#8217;&#8230;??? Haven&#8217;t seen a single write bench from anyone bragging about their 3700 based drive&#8230;grrr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
