<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LSI Discovers SandForce 256-Bit Encryption Limited To 128-Bit &#8211; Problem Resolved and Fix On The Way	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-14911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=52633#comment-14911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-14908&quot;&gt;RapidSSL Ceritificates&lt;/a&gt;.

When we speak of encryption, I think we are speaking only to the same encryption that is available in all SandForce controllers which includes some OCZ models.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-14908">RapidSSL Ceritificates</a>.</p>
<p>When we speak of encryption, I think we are speaking only to the same encryption that is available in all SandForce controllers which includes some OCZ models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RapidSSL Ceritificates		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-14908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RapidSSL Ceritificates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=52633#comment-14908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I heard lot about; that OCZ also comes with encryption
model I tried to search on the Internet as well but can’t find anything strong related
to it. Do you know anything about it ? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard lot about; that OCZ also comes with encryption<br />
model I tried to search on the Internet as well but can’t find anything strong related<br />
to it. Do you know anything about it ? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=52633#comment-10973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10971&quot;&gt;Crunch&lt;/a&gt;.

I appreciate your response and have edited out the specific manufacturer as your point led me to check others to which I found the same.  Interesting...

Apologies if it offends in any way but I believe the point is best served without &#039;targeting&#039; if I might mention it in that way.  Tx!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10971">Crunch</a>.</p>
<p>I appreciate your response and have edited out the specific manufacturer as your point led me to check others to which I found the same.  Interesting&#8230;</p>
<p>Apologies if it offends in any way but I believe the point is best served without &#8216;targeting&#8217; if I might mention it in that way.  Tx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Crunch		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crunch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=52633#comment-10971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10869&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

It goes to show how much more Intel stands behind its products 100%, as compared to XXX, for example. They still list &quot;256-bit chip-based encryption&quot; on their site as of 6/24/12 @ 4:23pm PT.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10869">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>It goes to show how much more Intel stands behind its products 100%, as compared to XXX, for example. They still list &#8220;256-bit chip-based encryption&#8221; on their site as of 6/24/12 @ 4:23pm PT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10935</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=52633#comment-10935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10933&quot;&gt;MikeZ&lt;/a&gt;.

Absolutely none, and in fact, you have to wonder how many were utilizing such, or had knowledge of its not being in use, as it took so long to identify this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-discovers-that-sandforce-256-bit-aes-security-encryption-does-not-work-problem-resolved-and-fix-on-the-way/#comment-10933">MikeZ</a>.</p>
<p>Absolutely none, and in fact, you have to wonder how many were utilizing such, or had knowledge of its not being in use, as it took so long to identify this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
