<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 840 EVO Performance Degradation Problems Persist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gard Vikingstad		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21641</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gard Vikingstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=85205#comment-21641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got a 840 EVO 1TB that has the addressed performance issue. Right after I discovered a performance problem the first time, Samsung released the Performance restoration tool which I applied. Read performance then went up from 11-70 MB/s to ~520MB/s. But a little after, performance once again started to degrade, and now I&#039;m getting reads of about 350 MB/s - getting a little worse for every week that passes by.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a 840 EVO 1TB that has the addressed performance issue. Right after I discovered a performance problem the first time, Samsung released the Performance restoration tool which I applied. Read performance then went up from 11-70 MB/s to ~520MB/s. But a little after, performance once again started to degrade, and now I&#8217;m getting reads of about 350 MB/s &#8211; getting a little worse for every week that passes by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lowlevel		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lowlevel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=85205#comment-21481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interestingly enough, everyones discounting the 840EVO&#039;s and clearing them out. Bad sign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, everyones discounting the 840EVO&#8217;s and clearing them out. Bad sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Shepherd		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Shepherd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=85205#comment-21355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21039&quot;&gt;dzezik&lt;/a&gt;.

I always use Raid 0 - who&#039;s stupid enough to use Raid 1 when you can just buy a separate slow disk backup system and use the cloud? Imagine paying a fortunate for performance disks and using them Raid 1 hahahahaha]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21039">dzezik</a>.</p>
<p>I always use Raid 0 &#8211; who&#8217;s stupid enough to use Raid 1 when you can just buy a separate slow disk backup system and use the cloud? Imagine paying a fortunate for performance disks and using them Raid 1 hahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=85205#comment-21078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21071&quot;&gt;RobertGutmann&lt;/a&gt;.

And this monster goes upwards of 1.1PB
https://anandtech.com/show/8792/transcend-ssd370-128gb-256gb-512gb-review

Should be mighty durable, right ? Even though it has crappy 20nm MLC with only 1.5k p/e]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21071">RobertGutmann</a>.</p>
<p>And this monster goes upwards of 1.1PB<br />
<a href="https://anandtech.com/show/8792/transcend-ssd370-128gb-256gb-512gb-review" rel="nofollow ugc">https://anandtech.com/show/8792/transcend-ssd370-128gb-256gb-512gb-review</a></p>
<p>Should be mighty durable, right ? Even though it has crappy 20nm MLC with only 1.5k p/e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=85205#comment-21077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21073&quot;&gt;agooddecision&lt;/a&gt;.

&#062; Micron won&#039;t say it publicly, but we know their 20nm MLC is 1500 p/e cycles, so 16nm is less than this number).


No we don&#039;t know that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/840-evo-performance-degradation-problems-persist-users-now-petitioning-samsung-replace-affected-ssds/#comment-21073">agooddecision</a>.</p>
<p>&gt; Micron won&#8217;t say it publicly, but we know their 20nm MLC is 1500 p/e cycles, so 16nm is less than this number).</p>
<p>No we don&#8217;t know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
