<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for The SSD Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 23:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Samsung 9100 Pro Gen5 8TB SSD Review &#8211; Samsung&#8217;s First Ever Two-Sided Retail SSD Achieves World Class Speed &#038; Capacity by kenpachi		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/samsung-9100-pro-gen5-8tb-ssd-review/#comment-126965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenpachi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=110405#comment-126965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear SSD Review,  


In your &quot;True Data Testing&quot; benchmarks, where you compare Real World File Transfers, part of that test involves copying 15GB of OS files.  You have noted that the OS file transfer times are very dependent on the chipset used.  Can you tell us which chipsets are the ones that are very fast on this test, and can you reveal which chipsets are the slow ones?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear SSD Review,  </p>
<p>In your &#8220;True Data Testing&#8221; benchmarks, where you compare Real World File Transfers, part of that test involves copying 15GB of OS files.  You have noted that the OS file transfer times are very dependent on the chipset used.  Can you tell us which chipsets are the ones that are very fast on this test, and can you reveal which chipsets are the slow ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The SSD Review/Technology X Will Be at Computex 2026 and Sponsored by SMI by Dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 20:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=111919#comment-126823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126745&quot;&gt;Dave (also)&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m 75 and already have the rgb lighting and glass enclosed case. You&#039;ll catch up. But the direction motherboards are taking as far as connections go seems to be undecided. At CES ASUS made a big deal about their ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial where the connections all pointed towards the side sandwiched between the motherboard and a decorative cover. But that seems to be a one-off and all motherboards released after that are the same old design. No new BTF sockets or gpus from ASUS. Sapphire seems to be left to carry the torch with its 2 new PhantomLink motherboards and 1 gpu. Others like MSI with the Project Zero are helping with back connect but no BTF gpu sockets. So I&#039;m worried that these great concepts will just die off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126745">Dave (also)</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 75 and already have the rgb lighting and glass enclosed case. You&#8217;ll catch up. But the direction motherboards are taking as far as connections go seems to be undecided. At CES ASUS made a big deal about their ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial where the connections all pointed towards the side sandwiched between the motherboard and a decorative cover. But that seems to be a one-off and all motherboards released after that are the same old design. No new BTF sockets or gpus from ASUS. Sapphire seems to be left to carry the torch with its 2 new PhantomLink motherboards and 1 gpu. Others like MSI with the Project Zero are helping with back connect but no BTF gpu sockets. So I&#8217;m worried that these great concepts will just die off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The SSD Review/Technology X Will Be at Computex 2026 and Sponsored by SMI by Dave (also)		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave (also)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 22:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=111919#comment-126745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126640&quot;&gt;Dave&lt;/a&gt;.

I have built every PC I have owned, starting with the release of Windows 95. However, I have never been someone who would build a new PC just because a new chipset or CPU generation was released; just when it was obvious things have become much too slow, or in my current PC build to get a board with the TPM 2.0 module to keep Microsoft happy. 

     After reading your post, for the first time I checked into BTF, looking into the Sapphire GPU and ASUS ROG Crosshair X870 HERO motherboard, which brings me to this conclusion: Regardless of whether one wants to build a new PC for the clean aesthetics or not, I personally believe BTF is by far the best option. Having all the cable connections on the back just makes more sense. The on-board GPU power connector seems to be a much safer way to deliver power.

     Sapphire should definitely bring that GPU to the U.S. and the rest of the world. Even though my X670 motherboard will (hopefully) be fine for several more years, I would like to build a new BTF-based PC, maybe even with all the flashy RGB lighting in a glass-enclosed PC, and I&#039;m 70 years old! I guess I&#039;m just a kid at heart!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126640">Dave</a>.</p>
<p>I have built every PC I have owned, starting with the release of Windows 95. However, I have never been someone who would build a new PC just because a new chipset or CPU generation was released; just when it was obvious things have become much too slow, or in my current PC build to get a board with the TPM 2.0 module to keep Microsoft happy. </p>
<p>     After reading your post, for the first time I checked into BTF, looking into the Sapphire GPU and ASUS ROG Crosshair X870 HERO motherboard, which brings me to this conclusion: Regardless of whether one wants to build a new PC for the clean aesthetics or not, I personally believe BTF is by far the best option. Having all the cable connections on the back just makes more sense. The on-board GPU power connector seems to be a much safer way to deliver power.</p>
<p>     Sapphire should definitely bring that GPU to the U.S. and the rest of the world. Even though my X670 motherboard will (hopefully) be fine for several more years, I would like to build a new BTF-based PC, maybe even with all the flashy RGB lighting in a glass-enclosed PC, and I&#8217;m 70 years old! I guess I&#8217;m just a kid at heart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The SSD Review/Technology X Will Be at Computex 2026 and Sponsored by SMI by Dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/computex-2026/the-ssd-review-will-be-at-computex-2026-and-sponsored-by-smi/#comment-126640</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=111919#comment-126640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although this is outside of your normal field I&#039;m hoping someone who&#039;s attending can answer my biggest question: I&#039;m a firm believer in back connect motherboards with BTF gpu sockets (I have 2); are these dead or is there still hope for this? ASUS seems to have abandoned this at CES and the Sapphire Nitro+RX9070 XT PhantomLink doesn&#039;t seem to be making its way to the U.S.

Meanwhile, it will be interesting to see if there&#039;s anyone surpassing the Sandisk WD SN8100 in either read or write speed. Bon Voyage!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this is outside of your normal field I&#8217;m hoping someone who&#8217;s attending can answer my biggest question: I&#8217;m a firm believer in back connect motherboards with BTF gpu sockets (I have 2); are these dead or is there still hope for this? ASUS seems to have abandoned this at CES and the Sapphire Nitro+RX9070 XT PhantomLink doesn&#8217;t seem to be making its way to the U.S.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, it will be interesting to see if there&#8217;s anyone surpassing the Sandisk WD SN8100 in either read or write speed. Bon Voyage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Samsung 830 256GB SATA 3 SSD Review &#8211; Make Way For Incredible Performance &#038; Lower Prices by MOSFET		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-pm830-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-make-way-for-incredible-performance-lower-prices/#comment-126045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MOSFET]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 20:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=27304#comment-126045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Still using a 128GB PM830 as a TrueNAS boot drive (by itself).  Amazing longevity.  It came from a 2012 Dell Latitude IvyBridge laptop that I got new for work, in 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still using a 128GB PM830 as a TrueNAS boot drive (by itself).  Amazing longevity.  It came from a 2012 Dell Latitude IvyBridge laptop that I got new for work, in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
