<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The SSD Processor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ssd-guides/buyers-guide/the-ssd-controller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ssd-guides/buyers-guide/the-ssd-controller/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ssd-guides/buyers-guide/the-ssd-controller/#comment-7325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=2082#comment-7325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just bought an Intel X-25 M 80GB for about 200$ about 4 months ago because they were running low in stock, only one in the province.

To my understanding, the controller inside that SSD was supposed to be a good one that used a different type of compression to the flash. Nevertheless, what do you think about the new Indilinx and Sandforce SSDs being made my OCZ?

I heard that the SF series, across the board, suffers from the trim effect on the SSDs overall memory. Indilinx was a reputable Korean company that ended up being bought and incorporated by OCZ.

I&#039;m just curious as to what your sentiments are to the new SF controllers and if you think the new OCZ Indilinx SSD&#039;s, IE the Arowana Series, are as good as the ones in the past.

I remember reading something about the SLC and MLC memory distribution of the SSD&#039;s and how that plays a role. I would like to apologize for my ignorance ahead of time as I read the article a few months ago and don&#039;t know this much about computers.

SITE RESPONSE:  Indy/OCZ SSDs as in the Arowana have yet to be seen in the wild so comment cannot ber made, however, there is a great deal of success with OCZ and present SandForce SSDs. I wouldn&#039;t be hesitant on this for a purchase in a second.  Also, with respect to TRIM, this is secondary with SandForce controlled SSDs because of their excellent ITGC (Garbage Collection) abilities and Dyrawrite technology.  A quick look at the success of the Revo series which does not use TRIM attests top that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought an Intel X-25 M 80GB for about 200$ about 4 months ago because they were running low in stock, only one in the province.</p>
<p>To my understanding, the controller inside that SSD was supposed to be a good one that used a different type of compression to the flash. Nevertheless, what do you think about the new Indilinx and Sandforce SSDs being made my OCZ?</p>
<p>I heard that the SF series, across the board, suffers from the trim effect on the SSDs overall memory. Indilinx was a reputable Korean company that ended up being bought and incorporated by OCZ.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious as to what your sentiments are to the new SF controllers and if you think the new OCZ Indilinx SSD&#8217;s, IE the Arowana Series, are as good as the ones in the past.</p>
<p>I remember reading something about the SLC and MLC memory distribution of the SSD&#8217;s and how that plays a role. I would like to apologize for my ignorance ahead of time as I read the article a few months ago and don&#8217;t know this much about computers.</p>
<p>SITE RESPONSE:  Indy/OCZ SSDs as in the Arowana have yet to be seen in the wild so comment cannot ber made, however, there is a great deal of success with OCZ and present SandForce SSDs. I wouldn&#8217;t be hesitant on this for a purchase in a second.  Also, with respect to TRIM, this is secondary with SandForce controlled SSDs because of their excellent ITGC (Garbage Collection) abilities and Dyrawrite technology.  A quick look at the success of the Revo series which does not use TRIM attests top that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
