<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SATA 3 SSD Review &#8211; PCMark Vantage Comparison Testing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jens		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/#comment-5785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=10775#comment-5785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/#comment-5325&quot;&gt;Ray&lt;/a&gt;.

Without any special tweaking etc. Here is some results if your still interested.

Configuration:
 - Intel i7 System with 12GB Mem
 - LSI 9265-8i Controller, Write Through (No battery unit yet)
 - 3 x 240GB OCZ Vertex 3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/1GB_QD4_3xVertex3.png
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/ASSSD_IOPS_3xVertex3.png
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/ASSSD_MBs_3xVertex3.png

Reached 1.5GB/s in ATTO and 1.25GB/s for AS SSD.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/#comment-5325">Ray</a>.</p>
<p>Without any special tweaking etc. Here is some results if your still interested.</p>
<p>Configuration:<br />
 &#8211; Intel i7 System with 12GB Mem<br />
 &#8211; LSI 9265-8i Controller, Write Through (No battery unit yet)<br />
 &#8211; 3 x 240GB OCZ Vertex 3</p>
<p><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/1GB_QD4_3xVertex3.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/1GB_QD4_3xVertex3.png</a><br />
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/ASSSD_IOPS_3xVertex3.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/ASSSD_IOPS_3xVertex3.png</a><br />
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/ASSSD_MBs_3xVertex3.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19015194/ASSSD_MBs_3xVertex3.png</a></p>
<p>Reached 1.5GB/s in ATTO and 1.25GB/s for AS SSD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/#comment-5325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=10775#comment-5325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmmm... interesting indeed.

What could one perhaps expect from 2 or 3 240GB Vertex 3 in RAID?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; interesting indeed.</p>
<p>What could one perhaps expect from 2 or 3 240GB Vertex 3 in RAID?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PREGIS		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/vertex-3-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-testing/#comment-5167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PREGIS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=10775#comment-5167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear,

Your article is a goldmine !!

As ssd is mainly used for OS in my case 60GB is great 120GB is huge, 256GB is too much, is there a performance difference between various capacity models ?

60GB vs 120GB vs 256GB ?

Best regards.

SITE RESPONSE:  There are performance differences in capacities of all models except for SandForce controlled drives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear,</p>
<p>Your article is a goldmine !!</p>
<p>As ssd is mainly used for OS in my case 60GB is great 120GB is huge, 256GB is too much, is there a performance difference between various capacity models ?</p>
<p>60GB vs 120GB vs 256GB ?</p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
<p>SITE RESPONSE:  There are performance differences in capacities of all models except for SandForce controlled drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
