<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SanDisk Extreme II SSD Review (240GB) &#8211; SanDisk Finds That Sweet Spot and Hits a Home Run	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CAPete		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAPete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=68942#comment-18900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18693&quot;&gt;Alan&lt;/a&gt;.

SanDisk&#039;s spec summary on their website says max write power is 5.0W (vs. 8), or 1A at 5V -- still maybe a bit high.  Typical &quot;active&quot; is spec&#039;ed at 0.22W.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18693">Alan</a>.</p>
<p>SanDisk&#8217;s spec summary on their website says max write power is 5.0W (vs. 8), or 1A at 5V &#8212; still maybe a bit high.  Typical &#8220;active&#8221; is spec&#8217;ed at 0.22W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jalyst		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18696</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jalyst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=68942#comment-18696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18693&quot;&gt;Alan&lt;/a&gt;.

And? Why would you expect otherwise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18693">Alan</a>.</p>
<p>And? Why would you expect otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=68942#comment-18693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Look at the current this thing draws:  1.6A at 5V would require two USB 3 ports or three USB 2 ports to power it in a portable case. It is only suitable for use in cases with external power or inside a computer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the current this thing draws:  1.6A at 5V would require two USB 3 ports or three USB 2 ports to power it in a portable case. It is only suitable for use in cases with external power or inside a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=68942#comment-18124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18122&quot;&gt;Cypherdude&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for pointing this out. The award seems to have vanished but will be back soonest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18122">Cypherdude</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for pointing this out. The award seems to have vanished but will be back soonest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cypherdude		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sandisk-extreme-ii-ssd-review-240gb-sandisk-hits-the-sweet-spot/#comment-18122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cypherdude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=68942#comment-18122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello, your Samsung 840 Pro 512GB SSD Review is dated September 24, 2012 and you gave it your Editor&#039;s Choice award, with the final-awards-0211.png graphic.

The SanDisk Extreme II SSD Review on this page is dated June 26, 2013 and you also gave it your Editor&#039;s Choice award, no graphic though.  Which SSD currently has your Editor&#039;s Choice award?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, your Samsung 840 Pro 512GB SSD Review is dated September 24, 2012 and you gave it your Editor&#8217;s Choice award, with the final-awards-0211.png graphic.</p>
<p>The SanDisk Extreme II SSD Review on this page is dated June 26, 2013 and you also gave it your Editor&#8217;s Choice award, no graphic though.  Which SSD currently has your Editor&#8217;s Choice award?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
