<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Samsung SM863 &#038; PM863 SSD Review (960GB)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-sm863-pm863-ssd-review-960gb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-sm863-pm863-ssd-review-960gb/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrea Verocio		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-sm863-pm863-ssd-review-960gb/#comment-22760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea Verocio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88449#comment-22760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does the SM863 (all capacities) support opal 2.0 out of the box?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the SM863 (all capacities) support opal 2.0 out of the box?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DecksUpMySleeve		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-sm863-pm863-ssd-review-960gb/#comment-22298</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DecksUpMySleeve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88449#comment-22298</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing that last year a slower 4TB drive went for $4,000, now for $2,200 you can do better.
Nice thorough review btw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing that last year a slower 4TB drive went for $4,000, now for $2,200 you can do better.<br />
Nice thorough review btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
