<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OWC Mercury Accelsior 480GB PCIe SSD Review &#8211; First Upgradeable PCIe SSD Hits The Streets	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 02:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=50066#comment-23109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23107&quot;&gt;Adam Connor&lt;/a&gt;.

The use of mPCIe was used as the best explanation at the time for the custom connector.  While you are correct that the controller is SATA on each blade SSD, this custom solution is a PCIE design.  Thanks again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23107">Adam Connor</a>.</p>
<p>The use of mPCIe was used as the best explanation at the time for the custom connector.  While you are correct that the controller is SATA on each blade SSD, this custom solution is a PCIE design.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=50066#comment-23108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23107&quot;&gt;Adam Connor&lt;/a&gt;.

I am curious what validation you might have to prove this.  Considering both the RAID controller and SSD controller are both PCIE compliant, your opinion should be validated in some way.  Simply because the connector of the blade SSDs is custom, does not mean the term still cannot be used for best explanation to the reader, similar to the way one compares an Apple SSD to that of the M2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23107">Adam Connor</a>.</p>
<p>I am curious what validation you might have to prove this.  Considering both the RAID controller and SSD controller are both PCIE compliant, your opinion should be validated in some way.  Simply because the connector of the blade SSDs is custom, does not mean the term still cannot be used for best explanation to the reader, similar to the way one compares an Apple SSD to that of the M2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam Connor		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Connor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=50066#comment-23107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23106&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your quick reply- however your review states
&#039;There are three detachable components which are the PCIe itself and two upgradable ‘blade’ mPCIe SSDs that can be switched off for higher capacity.&#039;
You have clearly referred to the SSDs as mPCIe which is not correct. Thanks anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23106">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your quick reply- however your review states<br />
&#8216;There are three detachable components which are the PCIe itself and two upgradable ‘blade’ mPCIe SSDs that can be switched off for higher capacity.&#8217;<br />
You have clearly referred to the SSDs as mPCIe which is not correct. Thanks anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23106</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=50066#comment-23106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23105&quot;&gt;Adam Connor&lt;/a&gt;.

The review is correct and it is not stated that the SF-2281 is a PCIE controller.  This package is a PCIE product, in that, it is connect d via this route.  Thanks anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23105">Adam Connor</a>.</p>
<p>The review is correct and it is not stated that the SF-2281 is a PCIE controller.  This package is a PCIE product, in that, it is connect d via this route.  Thanks anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam Connor		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-mercury-accelsior-480gb-pcie-ssd-review-first-upgradeable-pcie-ssd-hits-the-streets/#comment-23105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Connor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=50066#comment-23105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[spotted something that needs correction in your review- SandForce SF-2281 is a SATA controller not PCIe, and the Marvell RAID controller is also a SATA part. Not sure where you got the idea that the SSDs in this review were PCIe, but they are not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spotted something that needs correction in your review- SandForce SF-2281 is a SATA controller not PCIe, and the Marvell RAID controller is also a SATA part. Not sure where you got the idea that the SSDs in this review were PCIe, but they are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
