<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OWC Envoy Pro EX USB 3.0 Bus-Powered Portable SSD Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-envoy-pro-ex-240gb-usb-3-0-external-storage-ssd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-envoy-pro-ex-240gb-usb-3-0-external-storage-ssd-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bula Nula		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/owc-envoy-pro-ex-240gb-usb-3-0-external-storage-ssd-review/#comment-15438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bula Nula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=67057#comment-15438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very strange that USB 2.0 would make the 4K result so much slower compared to the 4K results on USB 3.0


Theoretically, 30 MB/s at 4K should be no problem with USB 2.0 either. How can we explain this behaviour ? Maybe the bridge chip used is at fault ? 


I still think 4K at speeds of 30 MB/s through USB 2.0 should be possible provided the underlying SSD supports those speeds. 


Excellent review !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very strange that USB 2.0 would make the 4K result so much slower compared to the 4K results on USB 3.0</p>
<p>Theoretically, 30 MB/s at 4K should be no problem with USB 2.0 either. How can we explain this behaviour ? Maybe the bridge chip used is at fault ? </p>
<p>I still think 4K at speeds of 30 MB/s through USB 2.0 should be possible provided the underlying SSD supports those speeds. </p>
<p>Excellent review !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
