Comments on: OCZ Vector 180 SSD Review (240GB/480GB/960GB)

By: HERETIC

HERETIC — Sun, 29 Mar 2015 03:00:00 +0000

How long will it take to forget-“Friends don’t let friends OCZ”

By: dravo1

dravo1 — Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:21:00 +0000

The PFM is interesting but as stated it does not protect the data itself. You won’t have a bricked SSD but you’ll have corrupted data (and a full restore on your hands) if power is lost and the cache is holding write data. Supercaps are the only thing that will prevent that. Crucial showed that with the M500 series. Wish more companies jumped on that bandwagon.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:07:00 +0000

In reply to Sean Webster. Ok sounds good. Could you test an compare some of the new top brand ssds ? Mushkin Striker, Pny cs2111, Patriot Blaze, Corsair Neutron XT? I would like to see consistency bandwidth comparisons for these ssds. This way we can see how the new controllers stack up against each other. I hope you get some soon!

By: Sean Webster

Sean Webster — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:45:00 +0000

In reply to Mike. I included the reactor to show a comparison to how an entry level SSD stands against the top tier SSDs. We also do not have a mushkin striker to compare.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:40:00 +0000

In reply to Les@TheSSDReview. Why is the Mushkin Reactor in the consistency bandwidth charts with these drives when it is low to middle tier and the rest are top of the line ssds? Why not show the top of the line Mushkin Striker comparison instead?