<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OCZ ARC 100 SSD Review (240GB) &#8211; Consistency in a Value SSD	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DidItWork		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-22519</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DidItWork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81655#comment-22519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20052&quot;&gt;Benjamin Hojnik&lt;/a&gt;.

But not the cleverer ones, I believe/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20052">Benjamin Hojnik</a>.</p>
<p>But not the cleverer ones, I believe/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Derek Smith		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81655#comment-20955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great Review.  Thanks.  It helped me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Review.  Thanks.  It helped me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cochise007		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cochise007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81655#comment-20864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the mx100 looks cant be bought for under £74 in the Uk and this can be picked up for £65]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the mx100 looks cant be bought for under £74 in the Uk and this can be picked up for £65</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81655#comment-20052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20051&quot;&gt;okynorch&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah that kind of crazy consistency is not really applicable to the potential buyer, that buys value drives. Yeah, its nice to have great consistency, but then again, avarage user will never write that much and if you&#039;re using trim aware OS, performance will always restore to its optimal state.


So the way i see it; its 22€ more expensive and has 16GB less space (for 256GB class). Yeah i think pretty much everyone buying a value drive will go with cheaper &quot;alternative&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20051">okynorch</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah that kind of crazy consistency is not really applicable to the potential buyer, that buys value drives. Yeah, its nice to have great consistency, but then again, avarage user will never write that much and if you&#8217;re using trim aware OS, performance will always restore to its optimal state.</p>
<p>So the way i see it; its 22€ more expensive and has 16GB less space (for 256GB class). Yeah i think pretty much everyone buying a value drive will go with cheaper &#8220;alternative&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: okynorch		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[okynorch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81655#comment-20051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20031&quot;&gt;Benjamin Hojnik&lt;/a&gt;.

Performance and features wise the SSD series is actually darn close to the Vertex 460 we recently tested and overall it is faster than the Crucial MX100 really. That MX100 will drop in performance fast once you start to really utilize that SSD, that&#039;s not the case with this ARC 100 though.

https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/ocz_arc_240_gb_ssd_review,1.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/ocz-arc-100-ssd-review-240gb/#comment-20031">Benjamin Hojnik</a>.</p>
<p>Performance and features wise the SSD series is actually darn close to the Vertex 460 we recently tested and overall it is faster than the Crucial MX100 really. That MX100 will drop in performance fast once you start to really utilize that SSD, that&#8217;s not the case with this ARC 100 though.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/ocz_arc_240_gb_ssd_review,1.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/ocz_arc_240_gb_ssd_review,1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
