<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: TeamGroup T-Force Cardea A440 Pro Gen4 SSD Review &#8211; Top Speeds Great Value	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/#comment-60780</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105619#comment-60780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for test. Was quite for some time here.

Here is my suggestion I once mailed, but got no response :)
Could you testers please start to do more real life testing of programs, data transfers etc.?
There is zero benefit of all those benchmark programms, which do basically do the same.
Crystal Disk, Atto Disk, AS SSD, Anvil storage, Aja etc. are all redundant. You guys can keep 1 - 2 and it is enough.

All these benchmarks are like fillers - remove them and the test becomes 1 page only ;)
You guys have to make a decision between easy doable test but with little value and more complex and time consuming test but with more value and actual meaning for yourself and the readers.
The companies sending the samples do want sugarcoated benchmark-test only, showing optimised sequential tests only?

Especially a big and fast 2TB ssd like this, would benefit from some actual file tests of videos, data, slc-cache, fill rate, multiple write intensive programs simultaneously, and other details.
Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for test. Was quite for some time here.</p>
<p>Here is my suggestion I once mailed, but got no response 🙂<br />
Could you testers please start to do more real life testing of programs, data transfers etc.?<br />
There is zero benefit of all those benchmark programms, which do basically do the same.<br />
Crystal Disk, Atto Disk, AS SSD, Anvil storage, Aja etc. are all redundant. You guys can keep 1 &#8211; 2 and it is enough.</p>
<p>All these benchmarks are like fillers &#8211; remove them and the test becomes 1 page only 😉<br />
You guys have to make a decision between easy doable test but with little value and more complex and time consuming test but with more value and actual meaning for yourself and the readers.<br />
The companies sending the samples do want sugarcoated benchmark-test only, showing optimised sequential tests only?</p>
<p>Especially a big and fast 2TB ssd like this, would benefit from some actual file tests of videos, data, slc-cache, fill rate, multiple write intensive programs simultaneously, and other details.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/#comment-60775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105619#comment-60775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/#comment-60774&quot;&gt;John&lt;/a&gt;.

Corrected and thank you for reading the report and p[roviding input.

Les]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/#comment-60774">John</a>.</p>
<p>Corrected and thank you for reading the report and p[roviding input.</p>
<p>Les</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/teamgroup-t-force-cardea-a440-pro-gen4-ssd-review/#comment-60774</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=105619#comment-60774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Page 2
&quot;ATTO performance hits highs of 6.64GB/s read and 6.28GB/s write which are **up** great speeds for this ATTO benchmark.&quot;

I don&#039;t understand this grammar (see asterisked text).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page 2<br />
&#8220;ATTO performance hits highs of 6.64GB/s read and 6.28GB/s write which are **up** great speeds for this ATTO benchmark.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand this grammar (see asterisked text).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
