<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SK hynix Platinum P41 SSD Review &#8211; Can Gen4 Get Any Better than This?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Atlas Rush		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/#comment-61548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atlas Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106077#comment-61548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/#comment-61546&quot;&gt;NikoB&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s not a loss of 2/3 of capacity. SLC &#062; MLC &#062; TLC means 2^n so it&#039;s actually 3/4 capacity loss. Basically, it would cost 4 times as much. You also have to consider that NAND density is a huge issue as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/#comment-61546">NikoB</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a loss of 2/3 of capacity. SLC &gt; MLC &gt; TLC means 2^n so it&#8217;s actually 3/4 capacity loss. Basically, it would cost 4 times as much. You also have to consider that NAND density is a huge issue as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NikoB		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/#comment-61546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NikoB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106077#comment-61546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can someone explain to me why no one makes and sells SLC SSDs today, even though Chinese SSDs on Chinese TLC memory cost a penny? What prevents switching NAND chips from TLC mode to permanent SLC mode, albeit with a loss of 2/3 capacity? But the speed is always the same as in SLC mode and an indestructible resource, plus a data storage time of at least 10 years.

What would a smart buyer prefer if they were offered a 2TB 3D TLC SSD for $100 or a 666GB SLC drive for the same price? Well, yes, I am aware that most people are idiots and marketers rule them ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain to me why no one makes and sells SLC SSDs today, even though Chinese SSDs on Chinese TLC memory cost a penny? What prevents switching NAND chips from TLC mode to permanent SLC mode, albeit with a loss of 2/3 capacity? But the speed is always the same as in SLC mode and an indestructible resource, plus a data storage time of at least 10 years.</p>
<p>What would a smart buyer prefer if they were offered a 2TB 3D TLC SSD for $100 or a 666GB SLC drive for the same price? Well, yes, I am aware that most people are idiots and marketers rule them &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/nvme/sk-hynix-platinum-p4-ssd-review-can-gen4-get-any-better-than-this/#comment-61542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=106077#comment-61542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nowhere in this review did you mention temperatures, requirements for a thermal solution, etc.

Would this be a good option for a PS5?  Does it run too hot?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere in this review did you mention temperatures, requirements for a thermal solution, etc.</p>
<p>Would this be a good option for a PS5?  Does it run too hot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
