Comments on: Corsair MP600 Pro XT Gen4 NVMe SSD Review – Yet Another Shining Example of Phison E18 Success

By: bob

bob — Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:03:40 +0000

No explanations or guesses how the SN850 achieves that 😉
Any number of the MP600 Pro XT is higher; in some cases by a lot.
I think I found the reason for that in another review: The big 281GB slc cache + controller optimized for 4kB IOs in the first run; second run it gets slower by a lot.
Not normal thing to do I guess?

Can you please explain if all/how many the ssd we see nowadays have
1) static dedicated slc-cache
2) pseudo slc-cache (taken portion from the tlc-nand)
3) dynamic pseudi slc-cache (like 2), but dynamicall adapted, changing size if needed.
If there are changes, how I know as a consumer?
Thanks!

By: morrissel311

morrissel311 — Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:07:50 +0000

Hi there! Thank you so much for the review. this was helpful and information..

By: TheSSDReview

TheSSDReview — Sun, 10 Oct 2021 02:40:12 +0000

In reply to bob. The SSD you are referring to was tested with the AMD Test Bench and the drives compared in this result are all tested with the Intel Test Bench, as stated at the top of the chart. As for that result, that review fully explains our surprise and repeated testing with the same times over and over.

By: bob

bob — Fri, 08 Oct 2021 21:33:06 +0000

Thanks for the review.

Please answer, why you say “The Corsair MP600 Pro XT Gen4 NVMe SSD is the second best result we have ever received in testing OS data, just behind that of the Plextor M10P.”
when the WD_Black SN850 makes this 15 GB OS-file transfer according to your test in 62 sec only!

Can you explain how the wd black 850 achieves this, what no other companie’s ssd can do?
The “older” 96-layer nand beats even the new 176-layer nand.