<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: MyDigitalSSD Super Cache 2 128GB M.2 SATA 6G SSD Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dareo		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-20725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dareo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=77284#comment-20725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’ve just ordered a Lenovo S540 and it comes with a 1 TB HDD (5400 rpm) + a 16 GB M.2 SSD for caching. This leads to several questions related to the SC2 Super Cache 2:

1. Could I swap out the 16 GB M.2 that comes with the Lenovo, replace it with the MyDigitalSSD SC2 Super Cache 2, install the OS and apps on it and use it as the primary boot drive?

2. What’s the difference between the MyDigitalSSD 128GB Super Boot Drive and the MyDigitalSSD SC2 Super Cache 2 42mm SATA III 6G M.2 NGFF M2 SSD Solid State Drive?

3. How reliable is this M.2 SSD in comparison to a Crucial MX100 or a Samsung EVO?

4. Would it just make more sense to pluck the M.2 and HHD from the computer and install a 500 GB Crucial MX100 or a Samsung EVO?

Thanks in advance for any feedback / advice on this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve just ordered a Lenovo S540 and it comes with a 1 TB HDD (5400 rpm) + a 16 GB M.2 SSD for caching. This leads to several questions related to the SC2 Super Cache 2:</p>
<p>1. Could I swap out the 16 GB M.2 that comes with the Lenovo, replace it with the MyDigitalSSD SC2 Super Cache 2, install the OS and apps on it and use it as the primary boot drive?</p>
<p>2. What’s the difference between the MyDigitalSSD 128GB Super Boot Drive and the MyDigitalSSD SC2 Super Cache 2 42mm SATA III 6G M.2 NGFF M2 SSD Solid State Drive?</p>
<p>3. How reliable is this M.2 SSD in comparison to a Crucial MX100 or a Samsung EVO?</p>
<p>4. Would it just make more sense to pluck the M.2 and HHD from the computer and install a 500 GB Crucial MX100 or a Samsung EVO?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for any feedback / advice on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eylem		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-20614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eylem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=77284#comment-20614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-18632&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello,
When we have a 128gb ssd , the optimal partitioning could be like this ?
100 gb for windows and most used programs
20 gb for cache 
8 gb for windows cache (like linux partition, if it works for windows?)

Do you have any suggestions ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-18632">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>Hello,<br />
When we have a 128gb ssd , the optimal partitioning could be like this ?<br />
100 gb for windows and most used programs<br />
20 gb for cache<br />
8 gb for windows cache (like linux partition, if it works for windows?)</p>
<p>Do you have any suggestions ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: theta1		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theta1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=77284#comment-19741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19740&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

I was thinking 64gb as cache, no separate partition for the OS. That way you keep it simple with only one logical drive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19740">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>I was thinking 64gb as cache, no separate partition for the OS. That way you keep it simple with only one logical drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=77284#comment-19740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19739&quot;&gt;theta1&lt;/a&gt;.

You could go that route but, IMHO, these drives have a wicked price point.  I would favor 64GB for the OS and then the remainder as a cache, rather than 32GB for the OS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19739">theta1</a>.</p>
<p>You could go that route but, IMHO, these drives have a wicked price point.  I would favor 64GB for the OS and then the remainder as a cache, rather than 32GB for the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: theta1		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mydigitalssd-super-cache-2-128gb-m-2-sata-6g-ssd-review/#comment-19739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theta1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=77284#comment-19739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was considering the 128gb version of this drive as boot drive for a thinkpad t440p. Then I read your review and now it seems that using it as cache may make more sense. Why mess around with having 2 logical drives and restrictions on what can be stored in C:, when you can have almost as good performance using it in cache mode. In which case I can save some money by getting the 64gb version, which should be enough for cache for the 500gb main HDD. What are your thoughts on that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was considering the 128gb version of this drive as boot drive for a thinkpad t440p. Then I read your review and now it seems that using it as cache may make more sense. Why mess around with having 2 logical drives and restrictions on what can be stored in C:, when you can have almost as good performance using it in cache mode. In which case I can save some money by getting the 64gb version, which should be enough for cache for the 500gb main HDD. What are your thoughts on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
