<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lexar Play Pro 1TB microSDXC Express Memory Card Review &#8211; Good Things Come in Small Packages	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/microsdxc-express/lexar-play-pro-1tb-microsdxc-express-memory-card-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/microsdxc-express/lexar-play-pro-1tb-microsdxc-express-memory-card-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les Tokar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/microsdxc-express/lexar-play-pro-1tb-microsdxc-express-memory-card-review/#comment-110882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Tokar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=110332#comment-110882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/microsdxc-express/lexar-play-pro-1tb-microsdxc-express-memory-card-review/#comment-110868&quot;&gt;Don&lt;/a&gt;.

You are drawing comparison to one of the best  SSDs on the planet, the Samsung 9100 Pro to another NAND flash based product that isn&#039;t remotely in the same category, a newly released MicroSD Express card.  We have addressed this same question on several occasions by acknowledging that the beauty of having several reports published &#039;net-wide&#039; is the expanded nature of testing.  We are happy with our test regimen and won&#039;t be conducting any further sustained write testing as the sustained write testing conducted on this MicroSD Express card is completely valid. In fact, we might suggest that our &#039;sustained write&#039; testing doesn&#039;t get much better than ACTUAL movement of several complete programs from and back onto the device itself. Thank you for reaching out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/microsdxc-express/lexar-play-pro-1tb-microsdxc-express-memory-card-review/#comment-110868">Don</a>.</p>
<p>You are drawing comparison to one of the best  SSDs on the planet, the Samsung 9100 Pro to another NAND flash based product that isn&#8217;t remotely in the same category, a newly released MicroSD Express card.  We have addressed this same question on several occasions by acknowledging that the beauty of having several reports published &#8216;net-wide&#8217; is the expanded nature of testing.  We are happy with our test regimen and won&#8217;t be conducting any further sustained write testing as the sustained write testing conducted on this MicroSD Express card is completely valid. In fact, we might suggest that our &#8216;sustained write&#8217; testing doesn&#8217;t get much better than ACTUAL movement of several complete programs from and back onto the device itself. Thank you for reaching out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Don		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/microsdxc-express/lexar-play-pro-1tb-microsdxc-express-memory-card-review/#comment-110868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=110332#comment-110868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i wonder if you could test, a SINGLE file of 900 GB transfer in writing to it, whether then the 600 MB/s would be sustained, or whether after a SLC cache peak speed of perhaps 100 GB transferred, it would radically start drop down to its &quot;standard&quot; 210 MB/s for the rest of the transfer. Akin to Tech Powerup reports (i forgot with what tool one could do this, but maybe you have (or can make) a huge single file, to test it even in the Windows transfer. thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder if you could test, a SINGLE file of 900 GB transfer in writing to it, whether then the 600 MB/s would be sustained, or whether after a SLC cache peak speed of perhaps 100 GB transferred, it would radically start drop down to its &#8220;standard&#8221; 210 MB/s for the rest of the transfer. Akin to Tech Powerup reports (i forgot with what tool one could do this, but maybe you have (or can make) a huge single file, to test it even in the Windows transfer. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
