<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lexar Professional 2000x SDXC UHS-II Card Review (64GB)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuki Fuyui		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-24265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuki Fuyui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88861#comment-24265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dude are you FFF serious? The Samsung NX1 supported the SDXC UHS-II standard in 2014... And the Samsung NX500 right after.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude are you FFF serious? The Samsung NX1 supported the SDXC UHS-II standard in 2014&#8230; And the Samsung NX500 right after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88861#comment-23428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23425&quot;&gt;Aleksandr&lt;/a&gt;.

You too.  Sorry about your experience!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23425">Aleksandr</a>.</p>
<p>You too.  Sorry about your experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aleksandr		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aleksandr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88861#comment-23425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23424&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you :)
Have a good photo!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23424">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you 🙂<br />
Have a good photo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88861#comment-23424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23423&quot;&gt;Aleksandr&lt;/a&gt;.

You got a bad card.  It happens but in no way is it reflective of the card as a whole.  My main go to for my D600 is the Lexar and I can tell you it has been totally reliable, and speedy, for two plus years.  Trust me when I say that I put more media through that card than most and it is used daily.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23423">Aleksandr</a>.</p>
<p>You got a bad card.  It happens but in no way is it reflective of the card as a whole.  My main go to for my D600 is the Lexar and I can tell you it has been totally reliable, and speedy, for two plus years.  Trust me when I say that I put more media through that card than most and it is used daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aleksandr		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/lexar-professional-2000x-sdxc-uhs-ii-card-review-64gb/#comment-23423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aleksandr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88861#comment-23423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two weeks ago I bought 2 Lexars card: 64GB Professional 2000x UHS-II SDXC and XQD 2933x 128Gb. XQD – ok; about SDXC you could see down:

1. Look good. All the next - bad.

2. Speed. Testing system - MacBook Pro; 16Gb 1600 ?Gz DDR3RAM; 2,8 GHz Intel Core i7; Intel Iris Pro 1536Mb; SSD PCIe 1024Mb. 

Reading from Lexar - volume of 27195Mb NEF (Nikon raw photo format) files, approximately 20-30Mb each separate file. First: without card reader - reading time 322s =&#062; 84,46Mb/s. Second: throw the special Lexar USB card reader - 687s =&#062; 39,59Mb/s. It&#039;s a pity.

Writing to Lexar - the same as reading. First: without card reader - reading time 358s =&#062; 75,96Mb/s. Second: with Lexar card reader - 800s =&#062; 33,99Mb/s.

As alternative I tested SanDisk Extreme Pro 64Gb (95Mb/s). Conditions - as previous case. Without card reader. Reading time 317s =&#062; speed 85,79Mb/s. Writing - 357s =&#062; 76,18Mb/s. Very interesting!

3. Reliability. Testing camera - Nikon D500. When I took a photo and them saw a preview, camera gave Error: &quot;SD This memory card cannot be used. Card may be damage. Insert another card.&quot; It’s awful. 

Sometimes card work, but has slow camera preview reading speed.

Card formatted in camera.

Aleksandr]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago I bought 2 Lexars card: 64GB Professional 2000x UHS-II SDXC and XQD 2933x 128Gb. XQD – ok; about SDXC you could see down:</p>
<p>1. Look good. All the next &#8211; bad.</p>
<p>2. Speed. Testing system &#8211; MacBook Pro; 16Gb 1600 ?Gz DDR3RAM; 2,8 GHz Intel Core i7; Intel Iris Pro 1536Mb; SSD PCIe 1024Mb. </p>
<p>Reading from Lexar &#8211; volume of 27195Mb NEF (Nikon raw photo format) files, approximately 20-30Mb each separate file. First: without card reader &#8211; reading time 322s =&gt; 84,46Mb/s. Second: throw the special Lexar USB card reader &#8211; 687s =&gt; 39,59Mb/s. It&#8217;s a pity.</p>
<p>Writing to Lexar &#8211; the same as reading. First: without card reader &#8211; reading time 358s =&gt; 75,96Mb/s. Second: with Lexar card reader &#8211; 800s =&gt; 33,99Mb/s.</p>
<p>As alternative I tested SanDisk Extreme Pro 64Gb (95Mb/s). Conditions &#8211; as previous case. Without card reader. Reading time 317s =&gt; speed 85,79Mb/s. Writing &#8211; 357s =&gt; 76,18Mb/s. Very interesting!</p>
<p>3. Reliability. Testing camera &#8211; Nikon D500. When I took a photo and them saw a preview, camera gave Error: &#8220;SD This memory card cannot be used. Card may be damage. Insert another card.&#8221; It’s awful. </p>
<p>Sometimes card work, but has slow camera preview reading speed.</p>
<p>Card formatted in camera.</p>
<p>Aleksandr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
