<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kingston SSDNow V300 SSD Review &#8211; A Great Mix of Toshiba 19nm Memory and the SF-2281 FSP	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: L		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-18914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=60926#comment-18914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this review needs to be updated to reflect how Kingston changed the ssd from what they sent out for reviewing to what is being sold now. It&#039;s a big story that this website should have caught onto but it appears not. Instead I shall share with you a link to some up to date information.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this review needs to be updated to reflect how Kingston changed the ssd from what they sent out for reviewing to what is being sold now. It&#8217;s a big story that this website should have caught onto but it appears not. Instead I shall share with you a link to some up to date information.<br />
<a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-18224</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=60926#comment-18224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15436&quot;&gt;Diagrafeas&lt;/a&gt;.

Here is you answer....

https://media.kingston.com/support/downloads/V300_Benchmark_Brief_MKF_586.pdf



A follow-up review on the current asynchronous version might be helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15436">Diagrafeas</a>.</p>
<p>Here is you answer&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="https://media.kingston.com/support/downloads/V300_Benchmark_Brief_MKF_586.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://media.kingston.com/support/downloads/V300_Benchmark_Brief_MKF_586.pdf</a></p>
<p>A follow-up review on the current asynchronous version might be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diagrafeas		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diagrafeas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=60926#comment-15436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15433&quot;&gt;Slaveck&lt;/a&gt;.

For me the AS SSD numbers (on SATA 2) are the following Read &#124; Write 505,506.

Seq 256 , 175 &#124; 158 , 133

4K 14 , 11 &#124; 45 , 26

4K-64 123 , 91 &#124; 109 , 114

Acc 0.138 , 0.195 &#124; 0.321 , 0.405]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15433">Slaveck</a>.</p>
<p>For me the AS SSD numbers (on SATA 2) are the following Read | Write 505,506.</p>
<p>Seq 256 , 175 | 158 , 133</p>
<p>4K 14 , 11 | 45 , 26</p>
<p>4K-64 123 , 91 | 109 , 114</p>
<p>Acc 0.138 , 0.195 | 0.321 , 0.405</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Slaveck		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slaveck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=60926#comment-15433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15422&quot;&gt;Diagrafeas&lt;/a&gt;.

I have same issue, 506 is significantly slower. Can someone check it? Or retest with new FW will be more than helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15422">Diagrafeas</a>.</p>
<p>I have same issue, 506 is significantly slower. Can someone check it? Or retest with new FW will be more than helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diagrafeas		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingston-ssdnow-v300-ssd-review/#comment-15422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diagrafeas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=60926#comment-15422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have two 120GB V300s.
The first has 505 firmware which works at it should.
The second has 506 firmware and is way slower.
Could you check a new one with 506 to see if there are differences or is something wrong with mine?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two 120GB V300s.<br />
The first has 505 firmware which works at it should.<br />
The second has 506 firmware and is way slower.<br />
Could you check a new one with 506 to see if there are differences or is something wrong with mine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
