Comments on: Kingfast F3 Plus SSD Review (240GB) – Looks Like The Real Thing https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingfast-f3-plus-ssd-review-240gb-the-real-thing/ The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource | Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:24:53 +0000 hourly 1 By: johndoe https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingfast-f3-plus-ssd-review-240gb-the-real-thing/#comment-14898 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:36:00 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=63381#comment-14898 In reply to Winkey.

Look up on how a SandForce SF-2281 based SSD does over TPU. W1zzard has fill in tests and goes down to %50. [H] does the same at %75. W1zzard’s reviews are more likeable than [H]’s BTW.

]]> By: Les@TheSSDReview https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingfast-f3-plus-ssd-review-240gb-the-real-thing/#comment-14877 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:33:00 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=63381#comment-14877 In reply to Winkey.

It is a midrange chart displaying only the highest performing SSD for comparison and our site doesn’t fill test in our benchmarks at this point.

]]> By: Winkey https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/kingfast-f3-plus-ssd-review-240gb-the-real-thing/#comment-14876 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:12:00 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=63381#comment-14876 Any reason the OCZ Vector still is missing in the Vantage chart.

Any chance of seeing how the drive does with 25%/50%/75% data on it?

]]>