<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intel 510 Series 250 GB SSD Review &#8211; PCMark Vantage HDD Suite Comparisons and Conclusions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-510-series-250-gb-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-hdd-suite-comparisons-and-conclusions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-510-series-250-gb-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-hdd-suite-comparisons-and-conclusions/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: font9a		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-510-series-250-gb-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-hdd-suite-comparisons-and-conclusions/#comment-4422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[font9a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=11692#comment-4422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why doesn&#039;t your review measure performance before and after the disk is completely written to a few times? Does this Marvell controller compare against the SandForce 12xx series w/r/t ensuring stellar performance after the drive has been abused by filling it over and over with small writes? If it were SandForce-driven, we wouldn&#039;t have to worry. But with anything elseâ€¦.

SITE RESPONSE:  The unfortunate part of reviews is that, especially with the onset of SATA 3 right now, we haven&#039;t got the opportunity to spend on time intensive reviews so we do our best.  That is why its best that oems provide several reviewers with samples; it allows for variety in testing.

Something I find amusing though is that this is the first time I have ever heard someon make this statement on this side of the fence as it has always been aimed at SF drives in the past.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t your review measure performance before and after the disk is completely written to a few times? Does this Marvell controller compare against the SandForce 12xx series w/r/t ensuring stellar performance after the drive has been abused by filling it over and over with small writes? If it were SandForce-driven, we wouldn&#8217;t have to worry. But with anything elseâ€¦.</p>
<p>SITE RESPONSE:  The unfortunate part of reviews is that, especially with the onset of SATA 3 right now, we haven&#8217;t got the opportunity to spend on time intensive reviews so we do our best.  That is why its best that oems provide several reviewers with samples; it allows for variety in testing.</p>
<p>Something I find amusing though is that this is the first time I have ever heard someon make this statement on this side of the fence as it has always been aimed at SF drives in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
