<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Future Storage 240GB SATA 3 SSD Review &#8211; SandForce Makes Strides Worldwide	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 23:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anon		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-112900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 23:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24745#comment-112900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Strange, could not find ANY information about the Future Storage FSSC21AD240M4 (and other capacities) online. Seems like it was just a prototype that you have. However, based on the SSD you have with Toshiba NAND, it is most likely to be equivalent to the Mushkin Chronos DX 240GB as it also used Toshiba NAND and even almost has the same circuit board layout!

That being said, SSDs had evolved a lot over the recent years with these new Gen5 SSDs and even soon, Gen6 SSDs!! The performance of the Scaleflux CSD5320 is just INSANE!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, could not find ANY information about the Future Storage FSSC21AD240M4 (and other capacities) online. Seems like it was just a prototype that you have. However, based on the SSD you have with Toshiba NAND, it is most likely to be equivalent to the Mushkin Chronos DX 240GB as it also used Toshiba NAND and even almost has the same circuit board layout!</p>
<p>That being said, SSDs had evolved a lot over the recent years with these new Gen5 SSDs and even soon, Gen6 SSDs!! The performance of the Scaleflux CSD5320 is just INSANE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anon		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-112896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 23:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24745#comment-112896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8316&quot;&gt;Mindc0ntr0ller&lt;/a&gt;.

Not all SSDs are the same. Different SSDs product Different speeds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8316">Mindc0ntr0ller</a>.</p>
<p>Not all SSDs are the same. Different SSDs product Different speeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24745#comment-8322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8321&quot;&gt;Mindc0ntr0ller&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t believe I missed the point whatsoever, but rather, you haven&#039;t seen the one factor  pointed out.  These are not to exact systems.  In fact, even exact systems will not give identical results.  There are simply too many factor that play into the end score and one cannot simply break it down by such a simple comparison as you are trying to make Bringing forward the different controllers even makes it more confusing to the outside reader as we are strictly speaking of the Intel.

At the end of the day, IMHO, we need to realize that test results are never identiacl even in the same system.  This is all I can offer and I might suggest bringing this to our forum page where there are several experts who may jump in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8321">Mindc0ntr0ller</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe I missed the point whatsoever, but rather, you haven&#8217;t seen the one factor  pointed out.  These are not to exact systems.  In fact, even exact systems will not give identical results.  There are simply too many factor that play into the end score and one cannot simply break it down by such a simple comparison as you are trying to make Bringing forward the different controllers even makes it more confusing to the outside reader as we are strictly speaking of the Intel.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, IMHO, we need to realize that test results are never identiacl even in the same system.  This is all I can offer and I might suggest bringing this to our forum page where there are several experts who may jump in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mindc0ntr0ller		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mindc0ntr0ller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24745#comment-8321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8317&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

You clearly missed my point. I know vertex 3 is used in the review but that should not limit the sata speeds. What i am trying to say is IF all the same hardware is used except the motherboard just like in the bit-tech review, why would it under perform if the exact same intel sata controller is used?

Some motherboards also use Jmicron / Marvell which are known to perform less compared to intel. If you take a close look at that review, only asus sabertooth p67 seems to utilize the max speed of the intel sata controller.
Just look how poor the asrock extreme 4 performs with intel controller compared to your results. Something is not right here and i want to be sure the asrock can get the max out of its controller before i buy it.

Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8317">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>You clearly missed my point. I know vertex 3 is used in the review but that should not limit the sata speeds. What i am trying to say is IF all the same hardware is used except the motherboard just like in the bit-tech review, why would it under perform if the exact same intel sata controller is used?</p>
<p>Some motherboards also use Jmicron / Marvell which are known to perform less compared to intel. If you take a close look at that review, only asus sabertooth p67 seems to utilize the max speed of the intel sata controller.<br />
Just look how poor the asrock extreme 4 performs with intel controller compared to your results. Something is not right here and i want to be sure the asrock can get the max out of its controller before i buy it.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24745#comment-8317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8316&quot;&gt;Mindc0ntr0ller&lt;/a&gt;.

I dont quite understand what you are stating or asking.  It almost seems like you believe all SF drives should have the same result.  In the case of your quoted review, it was a Vertex 3 I believe, the manufacturer of which is easily the most innovative to be found.  On the other hand you compare the Future Storage which is a brand new release from a company that has never put out SSDs before.  Did you check the firmware of both?  NAND flash memory make?  Both will change the end result.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-sandforce-makes-strides-worldwide/#comment-8316">Mindc0ntr0ller</a>.</p>
<p>I dont quite understand what you are stating or asking.  It almost seems like you believe all SF drives should have the same result.  In the case of your quoted review, it was a Vertex 3 I believe, the manufacturer of which is easily the most innovative to be found.  On the other hand you compare the Future Storage which is a brand new release from a company that has never put out SSDs before.  Did you check the firmware of both?  NAND flash memory make?  Both will change the end result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
