<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Future Storage 240GB SATA 3 SSD Review &#8211; ATTO, Crystal Diskmark and Anvil Pro Benchmarks Results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-atto-crystal-diskmark-and-anvil-pro-benchmarks-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-atto-crystal-diskmark-and-anvil-pro-benchmarks-results/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Al		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/future-storage-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-atto-crystal-diskmark-and-anvil-pro-benchmarks-results/#comment-7320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=24777#comment-7320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Purely from a monetary standpoint, $513 is a bit much for a single 240GB drive, considering my four 60GB drive RAID0 array that cost me $396 outperforms it in the benchmarks.

SITE RESPONSE:  There is no comparison to RAIDING 4x60GB drives and purchasing a 240GB drive.  At the time of the review, an examination of typical 240GB SSD SF driven SSDS was made to which this was the result.  In fact, if we compare strictly Toggle Mode SSDs which this is, the price might actually be on the lowe scale.  Thanks for the comment!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purely from a monetary standpoint, $513 is a bit much for a single 240GB drive, considering my four 60GB drive RAID0 array that cost me $396 outperforms it in the benchmarks.</p>
<p>SITE RESPONSE:  There is no comparison to RAIDING 4x60GB drives and purchasing a 240GB drive.  At the time of the review, an examination of typical 240GB SSD SF driven SSDS was made to which this was the result.  In fact, if we compare strictly Toggle Mode SSDs which this is, the price might actually be on the lowe scale.  Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
