<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Eluktronics Eluktro Pro Performance SSD Review (250GB/500GB/1TB)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/eluktronics-eluktro-pro-performance-ssd-review-250gb500gb1tb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/eluktronics-eluktro-pro-performance-ssd-review-250gb500gb1tb/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 06:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/eluktronics-eluktro-pro-performance-ssd-review-250gb500gb1tb/#comment-21631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=86760#comment-21631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good review. I have been waiting for a new review on a sandforce drive with synchronous nand. It seems a lot of reviews of sandforce drives are with asynchronous nand, I don&#039;t know why. You hear a lot about Samsung, crucial, and all the 100 million different controllers. But not much about sandforce/Seagate I guess because it is considered old, but it works and real
life and consistency seem to be just as fast as the new controllers all without a dram buffer. I can&#039;t wait for Seagate and micron to pair the new sandforce controller with some premium micron nand then we  will have a real ssd!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review. I have been waiting for a new review on a sandforce drive with synchronous nand. It seems a lot of reviews of sandforce drives are with asynchronous nand, I don&#8217;t know why. You hear a lot about Samsung, crucial, and all the 100 million different controllers. But not much about sandforce/Seagate I guess because it is considered old, but it works and real<br />
life and consistency seem to be just as fast as the new controllers all without a dram buffer. I can&#8217;t wait for Seagate and micron to pair the new sandforce controller with some premium micron nand then we  will have a real ssd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
