<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Crucial MX300 SSD Review (1050GB) &#8211; Micron 3D NAND Meets RAID 0	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-24083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93574#comment-24083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-23729&quot;&gt;me&lt;/a&gt;.

Here
https://www.realhardwarereviews.com/crucial-mx300-275gb-quad-raid-0/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-23729">me</a>.</p>
<p>Here<br />
<a href="https://www.realhardwarereviews.com/crucial-mx300-275gb-quad-raid-0/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.realhardwarereviews.com/crucial-mx300-275gb-quad-raid-0/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Monitorm		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-23793</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monitorm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93574#comment-23793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FYI I picked up 2x 750GB on sale and run in Raid 0. 33% more capacity than the 1TB version for the same price and WAY faster in Raid 0 than 1x1TB, I am pretty pleased, keep an eye out for that option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI I picked up 2x 750GB on sale and run in Raid 0. 33% more capacity than the 1TB version for the same price and WAY faster in Raid 0 than 1x1TB, I am pretty pleased, keep an eye out for that option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Johan Whalley		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-23743</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan Whalley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93574#comment-23743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shorely this is not the scent of some Kibutzim Kowboy on Da Yeehaw? You know, where the ability to Fool The Fool-ables is not as Easy as any PC.

 That which is true, is true for ALL. Unlike &quot;Les Da Tokar&quot;, we all have 2 Eyes, 2 Ears, etc.. So Guyz N Galz, &quot;review&quot; like with like or else comparing Apples to Oranges is meaningless to either Apples or Oranges when comparing. Unless, Da Stupide-Dumbe are all-a-congregating over here at Da SSD Review Festivaal. Next, &quot;they&quot; be saying that Pillaging &#038; Plundering is AOK beecuz some Booke sez, &quot;Eets OK, Munn !&quot;


C&#039;mon, shorely The Stupid-Dumb are dying-off as quickly as Pillaging &#038; Plundering are flourishing beecuz Da Kibuttzim Kowboys are now nuclear-tipped armed. Why do it, even when you can? Unless ……. like &quot;Les&quot;, yore Eyes are like Da Cyclops.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorely this is not the scent of some Kibutzim Kowboy on Da Yeehaw? You know, where the ability to Fool The Fool-ables is not as Easy as any PC.</p>
<p> That which is true, is true for ALL. Unlike &#8220;Les Da Tokar&#8221;, we all have 2 Eyes, 2 Ears, etc.. So Guyz N Galz, &#8220;review&#8221; like with like or else comparing Apples to Oranges is meaningless to either Apples or Oranges when comparing. Unless, Da Stupide-Dumbe are all-a-congregating over here at Da SSD Review Festivaal. Next, &#8220;they&#8221; be saying that Pillaging &amp; Plundering is AOK beecuz some Booke sez, &#8220;Eets OK, Munn !&#8221;</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, shorely The Stupid-Dumb are dying-off as quickly as Pillaging &amp; Plundering are flourishing beecuz Da Kibuttzim Kowboys are now nuclear-tipped armed. Why do it, even when you can? Unless ……. like &#8220;Les&#8221;, yore Eyes are like Da Cyclops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: me		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-23729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93574#comment-23729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would you benchmark also the smallest model? I can&#039;t find any benchmarks of MX300 275GB on the net, and I&#039;m curious how much performance it sacrifices due to reduced die count.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you benchmark also the smallest model? I can&#8217;t find any benchmarks of MX300 275GB on the net, and I&#8217;m curious how much performance it sacrifices due to reduced die count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vorlon		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-mx300-ssd-review-1050gb-micron-3d-nand-meets-raid-0/#comment-23598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vorlon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93574#comment-23598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Crucial SE still can&#039;t update SSD firmware if boot drive is an NVMe device. I reported this problem ages ago, curious if they fixed this annoyance.

Performance-wise. I would still pick 850EVO. If anyone wants blazing speed for data then get any supported SSD, activate RAPID mode (careful, not advisable on boot drive) and enjoy. I have one activated on 1TB model with R/W at 7500MB/s and NVMe is nowhere (owning couple of i750s).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Crucial SE still can&#8217;t update SSD firmware if boot drive is an NVMe device. I reported this problem ages ago, curious if they fixed this annoyance.</p>
<p>Performance-wise. I would still pick 850EVO. If anyone wants blazing speed for data then get any supported SSD, activate RAPID mode (careful, not advisable on boot drive) and enjoy. I have one activated on 1TB model with R/W at 7500MB/s and NVMe is nowhere (owning couple of i750s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
