Comments on: Crucial M4 256GB SATA 3 SSD Review – Unexpected Performance in a Small Package

By: Les@TheSSDReview

Les@TheSSDReview — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:59:00 +0000

In reply to Stew Winston. It is unfortunate that you had this experience but this SSD has an incredible reputation with countless others running strong. You are, in fact, one of the very few who have spoken negative of this drive.

By: Stew Winston

Stew Winston — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:14:00 +0000

As someone who has actually owned this product, a Crucial 256 GB drive I can give an honest review of their product. Its simple, dont buy it! This drive barely lasted 4yrs. Despite all the assurances that I should get 10+ yrs out of this it wasnt even close. The drive was treated with kid gloves. After 1 month it was slower than a mechanical drive. The claims the vendor made on this did hold up!

By: Box Inhibitor

Box Inhibitor — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:17:00 +0000

Hi, Can u tell me why the Adata 510s has higher write and read speeds then this. And which would be better speedwise? I am looking for a good SSD for a Win7 I7 2720QM and was looking at speeds around 500 MB/s i got offered this for a good price but i just wonder if it is just as fast as the 500 MB/s models. Oops posted twice sry lost my first entry i thought….

By: Box Inhibitor

Box Inhibitor — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:50:00 +0000

Can u tell me please why for example the Adata Sata3 120Gb has higher read and write speeds and if it would make any difference speedwise between the two on Win7 I7 2720QM?