Comments on: Crucial M4 128GB SATA3 SSD Review – PCMark Vantage and Conclusions https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-m4-128gb-sata3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-and-conclusions/ The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:58:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: Peter https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-m4-128gb-sata3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-and-conclusions/#comment-5777 Tue, 31 May 2011 03:02:34 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=17429#comment-5777 In reply to Peter.

I mean, you have the C300 in your tables / data, it would be good to continue the comparison from generation to generation.

]]> By: Peter https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/crucial-m4-128gb-sata3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-and-conclusions/#comment-5776 Tue, 31 May 2011 03:00:35 +0000 https://thessdreview.com/?p=17429#comment-5776 I know that the 64 gig versions are going out of fashion, especially when you factor in sequential write performance and the drop in nand prices, but for comparison purposes it would be really good to include numbers for 64 gig drives, from Crucial and OCZ, so that we can make an honest comparison for real world usage situations.

]]>