<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Areca 1880ix-12 PCIe 6G SAS RAID Controller Review SSD IN RAID 0 &#8211; Lightning Strikes at 3.6GB/s!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ramos		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/#comment-16747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=11535#comment-16747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/#comment-10485&quot;&gt;CameronS&lt;/a&gt;.

I know your comment is 2 yrs old, but what else would you recommend for extreme IO Raid controllers then?


I use to use Adaptec in the oooold days around 2001 and they were expensive and mostly crap, I managed to break at least 2 I can think of, but its been 12 yrs and I am willing to try again, if you say they dont break :)  How many times in how many 24-7 days did the Areca cards crash?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/#comment-10485">CameronS</a>.</p>
<p>I know your comment is 2 yrs old, but what else would you recommend for extreme IO Raid controllers then?</p>
<p>I use to use Adaptec in the oooold days around 2001 and they were expensive and mostly crap, I managed to break at least 2 I can think of, but its been 12 yrs and I am willing to try again, if you say they dont break 🙂  How many times in how many 24-7 days did the Areca cards crash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ramos		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/#comment-16746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=11535#comment-16746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know this is an old test, but how can this RAID controller fire off more than 2GB/s ?

It&#039;s labeled as a PCI-e 8x, meaning 8 channels of 250MB/s each way, max 2 GB/s (bit less as we divide by 1024 but still).



Did they use the full 16x when they had to or is this testnumber of 3GB/s skewed by the cache on the RAID card?


Lets say you fired up 64GB RAM, used 56GB in a RAMdisk for extreme IO purposes, then took a backup of those 56GB to the RAID, could it maintain 2+ GB/s then?


Would be interesting to test out next time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old test, but how can this RAID controller fire off more than 2GB/s ?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s labeled as a PCI-e 8x, meaning 8 channels of 250MB/s each way, max 2 GB/s (bit less as we divide by 1024 but still).</p>
<p>Did they use the full 16x when they had to or is this testnumber of 3GB/s skewed by the cache on the RAID card?</p>
<p>Lets say you fired up 64GB RAM, used 56GB in a RAMdisk for extreme IO purposes, then took a backup of those 56GB to the RAID, could it maintain 2+ GB/s then?</p>
<p>Would be interesting to test out next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CameronS		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/areca-1880ix-12-pcie-6g-sas-raid-controller-review-ssd-in-raid-0-lightning-strikes-at-3-6gbs/#comment-10485</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CameronS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=11535#comment-10485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These may be great cards for enthusiast gamer workstations.  We&#039;ve had poor reliability in our IO intensive enterprise application.  They crash, taking the OS with them.  We&#039;re swapping them back out, in favor of slower but reliable enterprise class controllers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These may be great cards for enthusiast gamer workstations.  We&#8217;ve had poor reliability in our IO intensive enterprise application.  They crash, taking the OS with them.  We&#8217;re swapping them back out, in favor of slower but reliable enterprise class controllers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
