<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ADATA XPG SX900 256GB SATA 3 SSD Review &#8211; Expanded Capacity and SandForce Driven Speed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=46169#comment-10764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is a slight inaccuracy in your reviews which is (implicitly) already mentioned above, but which i&#039;d like to clear up.  Flash memory has raw capacities of binary powers, this one e. g. has a raw capacity of 256 * 2^30 = 274877906944 bytes = 256 &quot;GiBi&quot; Bytes.  Vendors prefer to use decimal powers, as the numbers are slightly higher, so this SSD has a raw capacity of 275 * 10^9 Bytes = 275 GB.  7% of these are used for over-provisioning leaving the user with 256 GB = 238 GiB.  Windows, again, uses binary powers to display drive capacities, so the latter number is what you see there.  (No, NTFS formatting doesn&#039;t swallow 18 GB of the drive capacity. ;-)  Other Sandforce SSDs with 240 GB = 223 GiB user capacity use 14% of the raw flash capacity for over-provisioning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a slight inaccuracy in your reviews which is (implicitly) already mentioned above, but which i&#8217;d like to clear up.  Flash memory has raw capacities of binary powers, this one e. g. has a raw capacity of 256 * 2^30 = 274877906944 bytes = 256 &#8220;GiBi&#8221; Bytes.  Vendors prefer to use decimal powers, as the numbers are slightly higher, so this SSD has a raw capacity of 275 * 10^9 Bytes = 275 GB.  7% of these are used for over-provisioning leaving the user with 256 GB = 238 GiB.  Windows, again, uses binary powers to display drive capacities, so the latter number is what you see there.  (No, NTFS formatting doesn&#8217;t swallow 18 GB of the drive capacity. 😉  Other Sandforce SSDs with 240 GB = 223 GiB user capacity use 14% of the raw flash capacity for over-provisioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Muhammad Al-Jawhary		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhammad Al-Jawhary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=46169#comment-10073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10072&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

Actually, the image has a hyperlink as I said before, but the site uses a script to show the images, which in turn hides the hyperlink. Nonetheless, I have added a credit line under the photo that contains the link. Sorry for the inconvenience :)

Have you seen those numbers I got with the drive? They used asynchronous NAND flashes with the 128GB version! The same NANDs used with Kingston&#039;s SSDNow V+200.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10072">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>Actually, the image has a hyperlink as I said before, but the site uses a script to show the images, which in turn hides the hyperlink. Nonetheless, I have added a credit line under the photo that contains the link. Sorry for the inconvenience 🙂</p>
<p>Have you seen those numbers I got with the drive? They used asynchronous NAND flashes with the 128GB version! The same NANDs used with Kingston&#8217;s SSDNow V+200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=46169#comment-10072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10071&quot;&gt;Muhammad Al-Jawhary&lt;/a&gt;.

When I click on the pik, it brings me only to the pik....  Can we fix the link so it goes to the article?  And yes, I am sure we can affiliate post for one another in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10071">Muhammad Al-Jawhary</a>.</p>
<p>When I click on the pik, it brings me only to the pik&#8230;.  Can we fix the link so it goes to the article?  And yes, I am sure we can affiliate post for one another in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Muhammad Al-Jawhary		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhammad Al-Jawhary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=46169#comment-10071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10069&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your reply, it is a great pleasure to be here :)

Actually, it is your pic, and the pic has a hyperlink embedded (If you press the image, you will be directed to the great article).

We may have some future cooperation together, I may be able to translate some of your guides and articles and post them in the Arab world, and of course, the credit is all yours, not mine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10069">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your reply, it is a great pleasure to be here 🙂</p>
<p>Actually, it is your pic, and the pic has a hyperlink embedded (If you press the image, you will be directed to the great article).</p>
<p>We may have some future cooperation together, I may be able to translate some of your guides and articles and post them in the Arab world, and of course, the credit is all yours, not mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=46169#comment-10069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10068&quot;&gt;Muhammad Al-Jawhary&lt;/a&gt;.

Ummm isnt that my photo of &#039;all the ssds&#039; in your review?  I would appreciate the link back to our site and article if you are using any of our literature or piks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/adata-xpg-sx900-256gb-sata-3-ssd-review-expanded-capacity-and-sandforce-driven-speed/#comment-10068">Muhammad Al-Jawhary</a>.</p>
<p>Ummm isnt that my photo of &#8216;all the ssds&#8217; in your review?  I would appreciate the link back to our site and article if you are using any of our literature or piks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
