<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: MyDigitalSSD BPX M.2 NVMe SSD Review (480GB) &#8211; An Unmatched Value	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 09:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cat1092		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-24047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cat1092]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94970#comment-24047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-23979&quot;&gt;cat1092&lt;/a&gt;.

My first one was so good.....that I had to get another of the 240GB version, was priced the same. Wanted the larger, although pricing jumped by $25. In reality, don&#039;t need that large of an OS drive, have many high performance HDD&#039;s &#038; various  models of 120-128GB SATA-3 SSD&#039;s awaiting action again.

Just felt that any extra unallocated space (minimum of 10% recommended for most) would had boosted performance &#038; drive longevity by the controllers having lots of unused space to work with. Note that some SSD&#039;s (not limited to NVMe) has inaccessible space for this purpose, so manual over provisioning may be unnecessary. Still, it&#039;s good not to fill to more than 70% tops, this makes it hard for TRIM &#038; GC to do it&#039;s job, unless logged off &#038; left running overnight, which I do once monthly anyway. This can also be accomplished by booting into the UEFI (or BIOS) &#038; leaving on that screen for 8-12 hours, being sure to turn any external monitor off to avoid damage by a bright, still image. 

While for now, have the new stored in my safe, no doubt will be placed into service at some point this year. Have an ASRock Z97 Extreme6 MB, need to RMA to repair the CPU socket (bent pins), from there, no more needs to be stated........

A short follow-up review on my original MyDigitalSSD 240GB, it&#039;s running great as ever with consistent benchmarks, otherwise surely wouldn&#039;t had purchased a 2nd &#038; then store for who knows when. 

Cat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-23979">cat1092</a>.</p>
<p>My first one was so good&#8230;..that I had to get another of the 240GB version, was priced the same. Wanted the larger, although pricing jumped by $25. In reality, don&#8217;t need that large of an OS drive, have many high performance HDD&#8217;s &amp; various  models of 120-128GB SATA-3 SSD&#8217;s awaiting action again.</p>
<p>Just felt that any extra unallocated space (minimum of 10% recommended for most) would had boosted performance &amp; drive longevity by the controllers having lots of unused space to work with. Note that some SSD&#8217;s (not limited to NVMe) has inaccessible space for this purpose, so manual over provisioning may be unnecessary. Still, it&#8217;s good not to fill to more than 70% tops, this makes it hard for TRIM &amp; GC to do it&#8217;s job, unless logged off &amp; left running overnight, which I do once monthly anyway. This can also be accomplished by booting into the UEFI (or BIOS) &amp; leaving on that screen for 8-12 hours, being sure to turn any external monitor off to avoid damage by a bright, still image. </p>
<p>While for now, have the new stored in my safe, no doubt will be placed into service at some point this year. Have an ASRock Z97 Extreme6 MB, need to RMA to repair the CPU socket (bent pins), from there, no more needs to be stated&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>A short follow-up review on my original MyDigitalSSD 240GB, it&#8217;s running great as ever with consistent benchmarks, otherwise surely wouldn&#8217;t had purchased a 2nd &amp; then store for who knows when. </p>
<p>Cat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-24013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94970#comment-24013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-24012&quot;&gt;Lester007&lt;/a&gt;.

SSDs compress data when it is being stored which provides higher write speeds than data that is not easily compressed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-24012">Lester007</a>.</p>
<p>SSDs compress data when it is being stored which provides higher write speeds than data that is not easily compressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lester007		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-24012</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lester007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94970#comment-24012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-23917&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi, the ssd is faster when the data is compressable, because of the nature of the controller?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-23917">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>Hi, the ssd is faster when the data is compressable, because of the nature of the controller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mychaell Villar Moreira		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-23999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mychaell Villar Moreira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94970#comment-23999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Muito bom .....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muito bom &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cat1092		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/mydigitalssd-bpx-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-480gb-unmatched-value/#comment-23979</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cat1092]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94970#comment-23979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Largely due to this review, I chose the 240GB MyDigitalSSD BPX over a Corsair using the same controller that was on promo on Newegg. While I was about to pull the trigger on the latter, switched to Amazon &#038; thankfully found this one. 

Performance wise, on a ASRock Z97 Extreme6 MB, although using a Sintech PCIe adaptor with a small fan for extra cooling, and would had purchased the Lycon or Addonics one w/out the fan if the Sintech model weren&#039;t available. Because in the native Ultra M.2 slot (just as mSATA), these SSD&#039;s will get toasty then begin to throttle. Oddly for me, I first forgot to turn the knob for the fan controller on, and HWMonitor was reporting 73C, opened the case, the fan wasn&#039;t spinning, once that was fixed, temps nosedived by 21C! 

Speeds are close to what my 512GB Samsung 950 PRO on my main PC produces, although comed up a bit short on reads. Yet look at the price difference, that NVMe SSD was $309.99 plus express shipping, whereas this one (although half the capacity) has just over a third of the price tag, and had I been looking at the 480GB version, would had saved a third. The 5 year warranty &#038; long TBW was also a sweet addition, however as technology evolves, this will be in a secondary build before either of these arrives, in reality, few consumers are going to reach 700 TBW on a 240GB SSD of any type, let alone 5 straight years as their &#039;main&#039; SSD. 

My only gripe, and it&#039;s small, the popular UserBenchmark site knocks my score down for &#039;insufficient samples&#039;. Furthermore, one cannot find any MyDigitalSSD product on the site, hopefully consumers will cache onto this as word passes, and believe me, having been a member of the Tech community for 10 years as of this year, word will indeed spread. I simply wasn&#039;t about to drop an extra $25 for a Samsung 960 EVO, when I had issues with two of the Samsung SSD&#039;s of that line, they used a software patch (read restoration tool) to address a hardware issue. So purchasing another wasn&#039;t in my plans, even had the price for the 250GB Samsung 960 EVO been the same or a bit less.

Packaging was also acceptable, there was no way that this NVMe SSD was going to be damaged by shipping, unless it was ran over. probably would had survived a pallet of packages falling w/out any damage. However, the way it had to be opened would make a return for a refund to Amazon or Newegg hard, although most all would swap if DOA &#038; the only thing I&#039;m docking the corporation (not the drive) over. Note that when rating, the complete package must be figured in, while this may not be a con for some (one won&#039;t get an &#039;open box&#039; that won&#039;t be noticed as such), I&#039;d prefer it to open just as any other SSD &#038; know how to check for prior usage at first boot, a spec that a retailer can&#039;t cover up. 

My final verdict of the MyDigitalSSD BPX (price for quality the main factor), 4.8 on a scale of 5. Which by chance, is slightly higher than I rated the 512GB Samsung 950 PRO less than a year back. 

Except for true diehard enthusiast, or one who insists on &#039;prosumer&#039; NVMe SSD&#039;s (am normally of the latter myself), I recommend this truly outstanding drive to the majority of the user market. Very few will second guess the purchase once up &#038; running, and if moving from a HDD, I recommend to gather all of your license keys, drivers, software installers beforehand &#038; perform a clean install. Just be sure to install the drive first, and boot while on the old one, so that the drive will be discovered in the UEFI (or BIOS), this will make the new install easier. 

If installing Windows 7, be sure to have the update for it, plus any instructions on how to install, as I&#039;ve only used NVMe SSD&#039;s with Windows 8.1, 10 &#038; Linux Mint 17/18 64 bit. Unfortunately, the update cannot be slipstreamed into the Windows 7 ISO, I guess that would be too easy.;-)

Have fun with the MyDigitalSSD BPX, as I am!

Cat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Largely due to this review, I chose the 240GB MyDigitalSSD BPX over a Corsair using the same controller that was on promo on Newegg. While I was about to pull the trigger on the latter, switched to Amazon &amp; thankfully found this one. </p>
<p>Performance wise, on a ASRock Z97 Extreme6 MB, although using a Sintech PCIe adaptor with a small fan for extra cooling, and would had purchased the Lycon or Addonics one w/out the fan if the Sintech model weren&#8217;t available. Because in the native Ultra M.2 slot (just as mSATA), these SSD&#8217;s will get toasty then begin to throttle. Oddly for me, I first forgot to turn the knob for the fan controller on, and HWMonitor was reporting 73C, opened the case, the fan wasn&#8217;t spinning, once that was fixed, temps nosedived by 21C! </p>
<p>Speeds are close to what my 512GB Samsung 950 PRO on my main PC produces, although comed up a bit short on reads. Yet look at the price difference, that NVMe SSD was $309.99 plus express shipping, whereas this one (although half the capacity) has just over a third of the price tag, and had I been looking at the 480GB version, would had saved a third. The 5 year warranty &amp; long TBW was also a sweet addition, however as technology evolves, this will be in a secondary build before either of these arrives, in reality, few consumers are going to reach 700 TBW on a 240GB SSD of any type, let alone 5 straight years as their &#8216;main&#8217; SSD. </p>
<p>My only gripe, and it&#8217;s small, the popular UserBenchmark site knocks my score down for &#8216;insufficient samples&#8217;. Furthermore, one cannot find any MyDigitalSSD product on the site, hopefully consumers will cache onto this as word passes, and believe me, having been a member of the Tech community for 10 years as of this year, word will indeed spread. I simply wasn&#8217;t about to drop an extra $25 for a Samsung 960 EVO, when I had issues with two of the Samsung SSD&#8217;s of that line, they used a software patch (read restoration tool) to address a hardware issue. So purchasing another wasn&#8217;t in my plans, even had the price for the 250GB Samsung 960 EVO been the same or a bit less.</p>
<p>Packaging was also acceptable, there was no way that this NVMe SSD was going to be damaged by shipping, unless it was ran over. probably would had survived a pallet of packages falling w/out any damage. However, the way it had to be opened would make a return for a refund to Amazon or Newegg hard, although most all would swap if DOA &amp; the only thing I&#8217;m docking the corporation (not the drive) over. Note that when rating, the complete package must be figured in, while this may not be a con for some (one won&#8217;t get an &#8216;open box&#8217; that won&#8217;t be noticed as such), I&#8217;d prefer it to open just as any other SSD &amp; know how to check for prior usage at first boot, a spec that a retailer can&#8217;t cover up. </p>
<p>My final verdict of the MyDigitalSSD BPX (price for quality the main factor), 4.8 on a scale of 5. Which by chance, is slightly higher than I rated the 512GB Samsung 950 PRO less than a year back. </p>
<p>Except for true diehard enthusiast, or one who insists on &#8216;prosumer&#8217; NVMe SSD&#8217;s (am normally of the latter myself), I recommend this truly outstanding drive to the majority of the user market. Very few will second guess the purchase once up &amp; running, and if moving from a HDD, I recommend to gather all of your license keys, drivers, software installers beforehand &amp; perform a clean install. Just be sure to install the drive first, and boot while on the old one, so that the drive will be discovered in the UEFI (or BIOS), this will make the new install easier. </p>
<p>If installing Windows 7, be sure to have the update for it, plus any instructions on how to install, as I&#8217;ve only used NVMe SSD&#8217;s with Windows 8.1, 10 &amp; Linux Mint 17/18 64 bit. Unfortunately, the update cannot be slipstreamed into the Windows 7 ISO, I guess that would be too easy.;-)</p>
<p>Have fun with the MyDigitalSSD BPX, as I am!</p>
<p>Cat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
