<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LSI 9265-8i MegaRAID Card vs Adaptec 6805 RAID Card &#8211; The Ultimate 6Gb/s RAID Showdown	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Norm		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-19332</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=27677#comment-19332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know this article is old but I&#039;m in the market for a good RAID card si I though I&#039;d share the following info for whoever else is (I&#039;m surprised at the lack of recent RAID controller reviews ... I can only find old ones).

Although the credibility of this article is hindered by the abundance of LSI banners on the website and by the over the top and obvious &#039;LSI-fanboy&#039; tone of the author (more professionalism would have helped), the numbers are actually not unexpected and I&#039;m surprised nobody mentioned this: the Adaptec 6805 specs themselves mention max 50K IOPS. That&#039;s about it ... it&#039;s a limitation of the controller and slow RAM. So it&#039;s not surprising at all that it can&#039;t reach the impressive numbers that the LSI 9265 did.

However, the Adaptec 6805 is not in the same class as the LSI 9265. A better comparison nowadays would be against between the LSI 9271 (same RoC, same RAM, but PCI-e 3.0) and the Adaptec 7805 (much improved RoC, DDR3 RAM and PCI-e 3.0, just like the LSI 9271). Adaptec advertises the 7805 for more than 530K IOPS. Prices are comparable.

I&#039;d be very interested to see a review of the two.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this article is old but I&#8217;m in the market for a good RAID card si I though I&#8217;d share the following info for whoever else is (I&#8217;m surprised at the lack of recent RAID controller reviews &#8230; I can only find old ones).</p>
<p>Although the credibility of this article is hindered by the abundance of LSI banners on the website and by the over the top and obvious &#8216;LSI-fanboy&#8217; tone of the author (more professionalism would have helped), the numbers are actually not unexpected and I&#8217;m surprised nobody mentioned this: the Adaptec 6805 specs themselves mention max 50K IOPS. That&#8217;s about it &#8230; it&#8217;s a limitation of the controller and slow RAM. So it&#8217;s not surprising at all that it can&#8217;t reach the impressive numbers that the LSI 9265 did.</p>
<p>However, the Adaptec 6805 is not in the same class as the LSI 9265. A better comparison nowadays would be against between the LSI 9271 (same RoC, same RAM, but PCI-e 3.0) and the Adaptec 7805 (much improved RoC, DDR3 RAM and PCI-e 3.0, just like the LSI 9271). Adaptec advertises the 7805 for more than 530K IOPS. Prices are comparable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be very interested to see a review of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: laurens		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-19227</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 11:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=27677#comment-19227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-9144&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

There is no trim support on raid controllers. You need to have a physical connection to the OS for that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-9144">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>There is no trim support on raid controllers. You need to have a physical connection to the OS for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: laurens		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-19226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=27677#comment-19226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t the speed of the Adaptec a bit slow? Makes me wonder why that is? perhaps because of the cables? If it were 10% slower of even 20% slow, OK, but I cannot deny that half the speed, something must be wrong with it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the speed of the Adaptec a bit slow? Makes me wonder why that is? perhaps because of the cables? If it were 10% slower of even 20% slow, OK, but I cannot deny that half the speed, something must be wrong with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E71		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-14256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=27677#comment-14256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe there&#039;s no mention of TRIM. This article is a waste of time for anyone planning to use SSDs in RAID long term.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s no mention of TRIM. This article is a waste of time for anyone planning to use SSDs in RAID long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsq		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lsi-9265-8i-megaraid-card-vs-adaptec-6805-raid-card-the-great-6gbs-raid-showdown/#comment-13481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=27677#comment-13481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was considering using an adaptec 6805 with 4 intel ssd 330 180 gb in raid 10. I keep wondering what will happen over the long run since there is no trim. How would the drives ever optimize.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was considering using an adaptec 6805 with 4 intel ssd 330 180 gb in raid 10. I keep wondering what will happen over the long run since there is no trim. How would the drives ever optimize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
