<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lexar Professional 1800x microSDXC UHS-II (64GB) Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lexar-professional-microsdxc-uhs-ii-64gb-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lexar-professional-microsdxc-uhs-ii-64gb-review/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lexar-professional-microsdxc-uhs-ii-64gb-review/#comment-22979</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=91219#comment-22979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Woah, those are some pretty expensive cards.

I wish manufacturers would make cards, tuned for random performance. With lots of single board computers floating around without any nand storage, cards like this would be great.

Instead of crazy 100MB/s+ sequential speed, tune the card for low QD at the expense of sequential performance. i&#039;m sure it can be done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, those are some pretty expensive cards.</p>
<p>I wish manufacturers would make cards, tuned for random performance. With lots of single board computers floating around without any nand storage, cards like this would be great.</p>
<p>Instead of crazy 100MB/s+ sequential speed, tune the card for low QD at the expense of sequential performance. i&#8217;m sure it can be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dzezik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/lexar-professional-microsdxc-uhs-ii-64gb-review/#comment-22978</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dzezik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=91219#comment-22978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[most cameras and other dont have UHS-II support. it requires extra interface, so the card is limited to UHS-I in moost appication and this is limited to about 100mb/s .You should rather test this cared against other in high end camera not in windows stupid tools]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most cameras and other dont have UHS-II support. it requires extra interface, so the card is limited to UHS-I in moost appication and this is limited to about 100mb/s .You should rather test this cared against other in high end camera not in windows stupid tools</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
